Retro Review: Premonition

How many times have we seen the plot where someone goes back in time to save a loved one from dying? What makes each of them stand out? What makes them a good one opposed to a bad one?

In the latest of this genre, Sandra Bullock stars as Linda Hanson, a housewife who seems to be living a standard week out of sync. The insane part is that during that week her husband Jim (Nip/Tuck’s Julian McMahon) dies in a rather sudden car accident. As Linda wakes up every morning a new piece of the week falls into place and the question still remains when the day of accident arrives can she save Jim?

We have seen this type of scenario a billion times in movies. The gimmick in this film is a little different and often it is a man saving a woman but it all is about the same.

I never thought in a million years I would ever say I like Sandra Bullock as an actress but she really surprised and impressed me with her role in 2005’s “Crash”. She was also quite good in the almost forgotten “Infamous” as Nelle Harper Lee opposite Toby Jones’s Capote.

I still think her performance in “Crash” was the best of her career. The crazy part is that you can see an echo of that performance in her character here. The scene where she meets the cop at the door to hear of her husband’s death is amazing.

The look and panic on her face is utterly priceless. But sadly that is the only scene in the whole movie that really works.

The supporting performances from Peter Stormare, Julian McMahon and Amber Valletta are just rudimentary, cardboard and phoned in. Even when there was supposed to be emotion coming from these characters it was like they were caught in a vacuum.

There is a lot of bad editing, camera work and shifting of scenes maybe the director was trying to achieve a different look for film but instead just gets an incoherent mess. The whole attempt just doesn’t work. I found some scenes to be shot so amateurish that it felt like I was watching dailies. The whole opening sequence and funeral is just horrendous. I have seen “Ghost Whisperer” episodes with better timing and thrills than this film.

The film is directed by Mennan Yapo, who won some critical acclaim for his 2004 German thriller “Soundless”. “Premonition” is his first big Hollywood production and sadly it shows.

Bullock’s strong performance just can’t overcome the utter amateurish and cardboard production.

(1 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Hot March 2010: Chloe

Perverted and critically acclaimed director Atom Egoyan returns with what could be the best movie of his career. Egoyan gave us such erotic classics as Exotica & Where the Truth Lies. His most critically praised film The Sweet Hereafter is still one of the most depressing movies I have ever seen in my life.

His latest Chloe sounds titillating, pleasantly perverse, thrilling and well looks to mark some wonderful performances especially from “instant star” Amanda Seyfried.

Retro Review: Osmosis Jones

Ever wondered what goes on inside the body of a disgusting over 40-year old man who doesn’t take care of himself. Well in the new movie, “Osmosis Jones” we find out.

“Osmosis Jones” (Chris Rock) is a “white-blood cell” cop who is on the trail of Thrax (Lawrence Fishburne), a nasty virus who is bent on killing the body they inhabit. The actual body is named Frank (Bill Murray), a daft zookeeper and single dad. Along for the ride with Osmosis is a cold capsule named Drix (David Hyde Pierce) who was ingested because Frank believed he was getting a cold.

“Osmosis Jones” does a lot of cutting from the animation (which represents the inner body) and the real world (where Murray is). It’s very hard to describe and react to the kinds of filmmaking in that they are so vastly different. This can become really uncomfortable as we find that one part of the film is so much better than the latter.

But I found myself really liking what the animators had done with the world inside Frank. I loved “Drix” and the evil portrayal of “Thrax”. There are so many hidden jokes and puns within the animated world it was a lot of fun just trying to spot all of them.

The animation itself is basic television animation until the third act of the film. The majority of the animation reminded me a lot of the short-lived television series “Fish Police”. The characters eyes and movements had a lot in common with that show. In the third act, the animation gets really clever as Osmosis actually leaves Frank’s body and a battle transpires outside the body. This part was done exceptionally well. Actually the whole animated sequences are all written exceptionally well.

The worst part about the film is the mundane world that Frank lives in. It’s boring and so utterly predictable. The daughter is annoying and her dad is even more so. Was this supposed to be this way or was the film just trying to play up the animation angle. Regardless it was very hard to sit through.

I really think the film would have been more interesting if the world outside was standard television animation and the inner workings of the body would have been computer animation. This way you could have still had the difference in worlds and not been so alienated in the outside one. Just an idea, what would yours be?

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Written: August 13, 2001

Retro Review: Minority Report

Is elite director Steven Spielberg on a quest or an exploratory journey? Does Spielberg want to become the late director Stanley Kubrick or is he just flirting with the possibility?

Last year, Spielberg picked up the pieces of the late Stanley Kubrick’s A.I and created a strange a twisted spawn that wasn’t Spielberg or Kubrick. Spielberg continues that journey with his latest film, Minority Report.

In Minority Report, Spielberg teams with Tom Cruise to adapt an infamous story from strange existential sci-fi author Philip K. Dick. The authors work has been adapted into other feature films including Blade Runner, Total Recall and last year’s Imposter starring Gary Sinise.

In this story of Dick’s, we follow the exploits of pre-crime detective John Anderton (Tom Cruise). Anderton is a driven and haunted man. He is tormented by the loss of his young son and believes that being part of the pre-crime division he can stop others from losing loved ones. Pre-crime is a new division of law enforcement in the year 2084. Pre-crime exists to stop murders before they occur and condemn the murderer before he has actually committed the crime. How man is able to accomplish this feat? Well, three genetically altered humans known as Pre-cogs dream into the future and then we capture their dreamt images and take the appropriate action. In some respect their dreams have to be unscrambled by Pre-Crime Agents and then addressed.

On one such day, Anderton finds himself being the subject of a pre-crime investigation where he has to race the clock to uncover a mystery to why he kills a man that he has never met. Could Anderton ever be a murderer?

The problems that I had with Minority Report were in the believability of the premise. For good science fiction you need to have some belief in what is going on. I had a hard time understanding that a man can be convicted and then locked away in suspended animation before he has even done anything. The movie even contradicts this point when it says that each one of us have a choice before we commit a violent act. If everything is seen and laid out how can we have a choice? The movie says the Pre-cogs are never wrong.

I felt very sorry for the Pre-cogs because basically they have been genetically manipulated to serve us as super-computers. We hook wires up to their brains and then basically imprison them in a chamber called the Temple where they are continuously drugged and half submerged in water. This is torturous, in-human and even slavery.

Cruise character says to the man investigating Pre-crime Division (played by Colin Farrell), “It helps if you don’t think of them as human.” Then I scream at the flickering film screen, “Of course their human! What are you some kind of slave-overseer?” The characters also dictate that they try to remain separate from the Pre-cogs. Is this some sort of relief for their conscience? Isn’t this just a justification of enslaving these gifted beings?

There is this greenish-hue displayed over the whole film gives it a rather dark feel that does have a lot in common with Spielberg’s last film, A.I. I am not sure if that hue helps the picture. It hindered it for me. I did wonder what the film would have been like if it were in full-color and we saw a fruitful and flourishing society. Also can you imagine how all the visuals would have looked in vibrant colors?

I had a lot of problems with the layout of the film and solidity of the plot. There were so many holes in the plot. Instead of chasing John Anderton, why did the police center in on his victim and protect him until Anderton came? There was a lot of the small stuff I didn’t understand. It is almost like Spielberg thinks we should know something before we even start watching.

I did like some of Spielberg’s action sequences but that damn hue alienated them for me. I couldn’t get into them because I felt like I was a pre-cog hooked up one of those machines. It is a necessity for an audience to be involved in any action sequence so that the adrenaline is transferred to the audience members. We want to be a part of the action and be pulled in. This wasn’t accomplished for me because I felt the hue was more of a shield than an aid.

When you think about what would it have been like if Paul Verhoeven (Robocop) would have directed this movie. I think he could have made a vastly superior picture. Spielberg does a lot to try to stray from the dark and impending storyline with attempts at interjecting humor. He humor attempts seem amateur and extremely forced. If Verhoeven would have made the film I believe that his kind of humor would have been noticed and it would have been successful.

In my opinion, the only successful Philip K. Dick transference to film was Blade Runner. In Blade Runner, director Ridley Scott developed and set the bar for dark futuristic films. His vision and the world he created were revolutionary. Now if you compare any other film set in a dark futuristic world you find that the film is just a carbon copy of Blade Runner. Minority is no exception. In Minority, Spielberg needed to find more comparisons and contrasts the just using an all-encompassing hue.

The acting of Tom Cruise and fellow co-stars Max Von Sydow and Colin Farrell isn’t very memorable. I do have to hand it to Farrell he does have his charisma down pact. I just hope that he finds a picture where he can really shine.

I can’t say that I enjoyed Minority Report if anything I probably groaned and shook my head through about 90% of it. I know my perspective is probably a minority but would the real Spielberg please make a movie.

(2.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Side Note: I am sorry for my spoiler-laced review. I try so hard to be a spoiler-free critic but I had to make an exception in this case. Some of the concepts and views in this film really rubbed me the wrong way and I thought they should be addressed since there seems to be no discussion on those points.

Written: June 22, 2002

Retro Review: Out of Time

Director Carl Franklin is probably one of the most under-rated directors working today.

Back in 1992, Franklin’s “One False Move”, which starred a grizzled Bill Paxton, burst onto the scene and made a lot of people stand up and notice. Franklin then returned to the limelight in the 1995 gem “Devil in a Blue Dress” which teamed the director with Denzel Washington and Don Cheadle. These films were amazing and cinematic achievements. But after the disappointments of 1998’s tear-jerker “One True Thing” and the 2002’s substandard thriller “High Crimes”, Franklin seemed to be lost to the void.

This brings us to 2003 and his latest thriller “Out of Time”. Franklin has gone back to what he does best by finding a “flawed” hero embroiled in a sweaty crime thriller. And if that wasn’t enough he brings along “Devil” star Denzel Washington for the ride.

“Out of Time” finds police chief Matt Lee Whitlock (Washington) separated from his wife, Alex (Eva Mendes) and sleeping with sexy married woman, Anne (Sanaa Lathan). Anne’s husband, Chris (Dean Cain) is extremely jealous and very suspicious of his wife and Whitlock.

When a fire engulfs Anne and her husband, Whitlock’s life gets a lot more complicated as his estranged wife is assigned to the case. Now Whitlock is running out of time as he must unravel the arsonist murders and solve the case one step in front of his wife. He must do all this and not let his wife find out about his affair or he could become suspect number one.

Franklin really delivers with this quirky, quick-paced and tense thriller. He seems to be in fine form as he able to meld comedic awareness and tense drama without looking over his shoulder. He gets dynamite performances from leads Denzel and sidekick John Billingsley as well from supporting cast members Cain, Lathan and Mendes.

The true staple of a good Franklin movie is his mix of jazz and blues anthems throughout the score of his films. The mix here adds to this films intensity as is seen in the tense scenes which are echoed by seemingly tribal drums. The beating of the drums earmarks those scenes with tone and texture. I can’t imagine the hotel scene without the drums.

What is probably the most surprising of this film is the humor from Billingsley and Washington. Their chemistry being laced with hilarious zingers makes the film not only tense but pleasantly funny without ruining its impact. It’s so nice to see a thriller that isn’t afraid to use comedy.

This is Franklin’s best work since “Devil in a Blue Dress” and will hopefully return the director to the critical acclaim that found him with his earlier works.

(4 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Hot March 2010: Green Zone

In this series, I am showcasing 4 movies you have to see in March. This is the best March movie season I have ever seen. The month is lined up like a summer month!

First out the gate is Matt Damon is back in March with another Bourne-esque adventure/conspiracy film.

The movie finds Damon reteamed with Bourne sequel mastermind Paul Greengrass. But when I watch this trailer all I see is Bourne 4. Just why not call him Jason Bourne?

Weird Review: Red Planet

With last spring’s “Mission to Mars” opening so strongly, Warner Bros decided to push back “Red Planet” so they wouldn’t feel the “Mission” tidal wave. As I entered the theatre to see Planet I thought back to “Mission” and hoped that it wouldn’t be the same kind of thing. I was shocked, delighted and a tad bit disappointed but Planet was still a better ride than “Mission” ever was.

“Red Planet” stars Val Kilmer, Carrie Anne Moss and Tom Sizemore as three astronauts on a terra-forming mission to Mars in the near future. Kilmer plays Gallagher, an eccentric mission engineer who has designed a robot to help navigate the Martian surface.

The robot’s name is AMEE. Moss plays the mission commander who has had a long career in the Navy and loves to hang with the guys. Sizemore plays a geneticist who knows a lot about the science side of the mission including the algae sent onto Mars’ surface.

Upon arriving around Mars, the astronauts are thrown into jeopardy and Moss commands her crew to abandon ship. As she watches her crew escape she decides to stay behind in a last desperate effort to save her ship. Will the captain repair the ship in time? What will the astronauts find on the Martian surface?

“Red Planet” has a fast beginning and allows the viewer to spend a lot of time on the Martian surface. Planet is very raw. Like Apollo 13, we have a lot of desperation in trying to find a little piece of something that could help to save the mission. I liked this tension and the appearance of no safety net as the astronauts fight to survive. I loved the unique robot created by Kilmer and how it becomes a threat on the planet.

The real sad thing I found about Planet was how they used a lot of hokey ways to get out of tension sequences. One example was when the crew can’t communicate with their ship so they decide to walk over and find a probe sent to Mars back in 1997. (Can anyone say Pathfinder?) They rip apart Pathfinder grab on of the internal boards and two wires and call for help.

For me that seemed to be pulled off the same way as the Professor made inventions from two coconuts in the TV series “Gilligan’s Island”. There are at least six more of these hokey circumstances. Write me if you can name them.

Over all I enjoyed Planet for its raw and original take on Mars but I just wished there was a little more ingenuity thrown in to some of the mission parameters.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Movie Review: The Wolf Man (2010)

What has sharp fangs, ruffled hair, a mean disposition, a craving for fresh meat and an accent?

No I am not talking about a British cougar who just caught a glimpse of Robert Pattison.

I am talking about Universal’s latest attempt to put some juice back into their long dormant monster franchise.

Ever since the hugely popular Mummy trilogy rocked the box office. Universal has tried to bring life back to its classic monsters like Dracula, Frankenstein, The Wolf Man, etc.

Everyone of their classic monsters has some sort of development attached to it. I can’t imagine the money that has been flushed down the toilet trying to find new ways to make these monsters live again. To quote Dr Frankenstein, “It’s alive!” Well not quite!

A couple months back I took us down memory lane with a review of the classic Wolf Man movie. So I thought it was relevant that I chime in to talk about the remake.

Benecio Del Toro takes over the role of Lawrence Talbot from Lon Chaney Jr. The movie begins like the original with Lawrence returning to his family estate after a death of his brother. There he is reunited with his estranged father, Sir John Talbot (Anthony Hopkins). He swears to his brother’s widow (Emily Blunt) that he will find his brother’s killer and find out what happened.

He follows leads to a gypsy fortune teller who tells him a family curse as a beast starts to rip the camp apart. Lawrence confronts the beast and is bitten. Barely surviving, Lawrence awakens back at the estate. His father tells him more about the werewolf curse saying, “you have done things Lawrence, evil things!” Lawrence Talbot is THE WOLF MAN.

The movie is about the same as the original until the film’s first twist. I’ll explore the contrast further down in my spoiler section but for now I will review the film on its own merits.

If you love werewolf movies and the mythos around them then you will love this movie. You’ll see all the scenes that pay homage older werewolf movies like the infamous scene from American Werewolf in London where the werewolf runs through central London causing a bus crash.

The performances from De Toro and Blunt are brilliant but Hopkins just hams it up. Hopkins is so uneven it’s embarrassing in places. The love story between Del Toro and Blunt is really pushed and you can totally see which scenes were reshot to amp up their relationship. You know you have to play to the whole vampire romance angle even if we are talking werewolf. Everyone loves a tragic romance.

The effects are done by Rick Baker who did the werewolf in American Werewolf in London, which was one of his earliest movies. He also did the werewolves in The Howling, Jack Nicholson’s Wolf and the TV series Werewolf. This guy knows werewolves and once again he does a frightening transformation and a wicked ass Wolf Man.

Probably my favorite scene is when Talbot is sent to a mental institution and the psychologists try to tell him he’s crazy and he is acting out. They chain him to a chair and wheel him into a lecture hall where they talk about him as an experiment as the full moon blooms. Talbot changes and attacks the shrinks. It is a brilliant, brutal and fantastic scene. It kind of reminded me of a cross between of Dr Jekyll and Bruce Banner before they turn into their alter egos. I was just waiting for the line “Don’t make me angry, you wouldn’t like me when I am angry.”

Wolf Man is a fun R-Rated werewolf movie that drags in places and definitely shows its growing pains and yes all the infamous problems with the movie’s production are visible. But I have to hand it to director Joe Johnston the terror he brought to Jurassic Park 3 is all over this movie and some scenes play really, really well.

SPOILERS BEWARE

In the original Wolf Man, Talbot’s father is not a werewolf, there is no inspector/Van Helsing type character (played by Hugo Weaving in the remake) and widow of his brother. Instead the father character believes his son is an abomination and joins the villagers by hunting down his son. In the film’s final scene the father clubs his son to death with a silver cane. The original ending was kind of unsatisfactory but the father’s motivations make a lot more sense than the nonsense that Hopkins peddles in the remake.

Original: 4.5 out of 5

Remake: 3 out of 5

Top 10 Werewolf Movies of All Time

Note: This list doesn’t include team-ups with other monsters (ie: Twilight & other Universal classics)

1. American Werewolf in London

2. The Wolf Man

3. Ginger Snaps (must see!)

4. Brotherhood of the Wolf (must see!)

5. Company of Wolves (must see!)

6. The Curse of Werewolf

7. The Howling

8. Silver Bullet

9. Wolf

10. The Wolf Man (2010)

So Says the Soothsayer.