Retro Review: Cellular

Okay, all of us are driven insane by the amount of cellular phones that are in our society today. From that guy who is constantly on the phone while driving to the mother who is screaming into her phone as she walks down the grocery store aisle, people just don’t realize how much they use their phones and how much they disturb people around them.

Well what if contacting one of these crazies was your only hope at living? Well, I guess then you would be screwed.

That particular circumstance is the only hope for suburban housewife and kidnap victim Jessica Martin (Kim Basinger) who has been able to use the remnants of a shattered telephone to reach out and touch someone. That someone is twentysomething Ryan (Chris Evans), who by a freak of nature actually listens to the woman’s cry for help. What would you do? Hang up? Think it’s a joke? Or become an instant “superhero” and save the damsel in distress?

“Cellular” is being marketed as a “nail-biter” thriller which is sure to thrill, captivate and excite audiences. The only problem is that the marketing people and the filmmakers each made two totally different films. There is nothing scary, thrilling or “nail-biting” about this movie. Instead what you have is a comedy-action film with a young kid who all of a sudden has to become a “superhero” and save the girl.

I was literally baffled to see how many different ways that stuntman-turned-director David R. Ellis was able to screw up the intense thriller based scenes. Everywhere the audience turns there is another thing to disrupt the tension.

The cellphone battery running out, going into a tunnel will lose the signal, crossing connections to another cellphone user are all plot elements that if executed well could have been hair-raising but instead come off as more “obstacle-course” comedy/action sequences than tense moments.

Ellis was able to use his style of action and humor in his previous film, “Final Destination 2” which worked some what but here it just seems in bad taste. Do we really want to laugh as a guy tries to save a woman from an insane kidnapper?

The film is based on a story by Larry Cohen (“Phone Booth”) and that story was adapted by first time screenwriter Chris Morgan. Somewhere between these two guys we lost a good movie. What happened?

As the film struggled for its identity, I found myself some what impressed with Chris Evans in the lead. Evans is able to hold his own in scenes and has great on-screen charisma.

I also liked poor Kim Basinger who seemed to be the only character scared in this film. Jason Statham as the kidnapper is a throwaway role for the actor. But if you have to feel sorry for anyone in this film it is poor William H Macy, who plays the cop trying to find Basinger.

Macy is a brilliant actor and a wonderful talent but seeing him with green mud on his face and him uttering cliché-like lines like “I am too old for this, crap” is just awful. If this would have been a thriller and more like “Hitchcock-in-style” than Macy probably would have been perfect.

So don’t believe the ad campaigns, “Cellular” is just as much of a throwaway film as one of those $40 disposable cellphones.

(2 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Running Scared

Director Wayne Kramer, who also directed the overly brilliant “The Cooler”, returns to the grit of the underworld with his latest film “Running Scared”.

Paul Walker stars as Joey Gazelle, a low-ranked thug whose only job for the mob is to hide their guns after a hit so they can’t be traced.

One night, Joey’s son’s friend, Oleg (Cameron Bright) steals one of the hidden guns and shoots his abusive stepfather (John Noble).

A police investigation ensues and Joey tries to thwart the case by disturbing the evidence.

Everything goes pretty well until Joey realizes that Oleg has escaped with the gun. The mob, the police and now Joey are all after the same gun.

Joey has to find the gun before the mob or his life and his families could be forfeit. Can Joey do it in time?

The plot of the film is quite intense and the film has some really nice camera shots and some really well photographed scenes.

A lot of the interesting shots are done with interesting camera angles and first-person perspective which gives the film a unique feel. The film’s opening sequence is a lot of fun and reminded me some of the sequence from last year’s “Hostage”.

I also have to say that I liked the performance of Paul Walker and Vera Farmigna who played his wife. Both are very good in their roles. I remember Farmigna from the short-lived Fox series, Roar from 1997 which starred Heath Ledger.

The problems I had with the film were the overly graphic scenes, some plot angles that were completely ludicrous and the film’s length. This film goes on about 20-30 minutes to long.

One scene that I felt was absolutely ludicrous was a scene involving a pedophile couple who captures Oleg and plan to use him in an inappropriate video. It’s sick, disturbing and unnecessary. I was also quite appalled to see the often brilliant actress Elisabeth Mitchell as the pedophile wife. I have to hand it to the actress that’s quite a departure.

I really liked the plot and the two leads but it really needed some work on subplots, supporting characters and length.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Movie Review: Legion (2010)

There was series of extremely well made “direct to video” movies called The Prophecy where Christopher Walken plays the arch-angel Gabriel who comes to Earth to collect a certain soul that is key to a war in heaven.

The movie was quite good and definitely a gem to seek out on DVD. At least four sequels followed and all were kind of hit and miss.

LEGION reminds me a lot of those movies unfortunately it is about as good as one of the Prophecy sequels.

The movie follows the angel Michael (Paul Bettany) as he comes to Earth after God has given up on Man and wants to destroy him. Michael believes that the unborn child of a diner waitress (Adrianne Palicki) is the key to man’s survival. Michael helps the people in the diner fight back the demons, archangels and psychotic ice cream men sent to kill the child.

For a schlock-horror-action film like this the filmmakers have assembled quite the cast. The cast besides Bettany and Palicki include Lucas Black (Fast & Furious: Tokyo Drift), Tyrese Gibson (Flight of the Phoenix), Kate Walsh (Grey’s Anatomy), Jon Tenney (The Closer), Charles S Dutton (Alien 3), Willa Holland (Gossip Girl) and of all people veteran actor Dennis Quaid.

Most of the great ensemble cast is wasted but still is amazing to see all these faces in a basically “who will survive” blood-bathed horror flick.

The biggest wastes are big stars like Bettany and Quaid. Bettany throughout the movie looks like somebody just slept with his wife and now he wants to kill them. But it’s just schtick. The man is great and this is sad to see. Quaid is an actor who has made a career out of playing the everyman and here well he is a diner owner who is in way over his head. What is he doing in a movie like this? Does he owe his bookie money?

I think I may one of the few who actually likes Lucas Black as a leading man. I know he has no range of emotion in his acting and no matter how hard he tries can never hide his thick Southern accent. But the guy is vulnerable and screams everyman so there is something to cheer about when it comes to him.

LEGION is what it is. Nothing more, nothing less. As each star meets a grueling death the movie falls apart and concludes with one of the most laughable conclusions I have seen in recent memory.

Personally if it were me, I’d be looking for Prophecy at the videostore than this flick. God, I wish this flick could have been good!

1 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer

Retro Review: Reindeer Games

Reindeer Games is a excellent opportunity for Ben Affleck to certify himself as a bankable star. So I guess the nagging question is he just that?

Reindeer Games opens with a Ben reflecting upon his life and how he so badly wants a change when his release happens in three days.

During that evenings meal in the prison cafeteria, Ben witnesses his best friend being killed right before his eyes.

Depressed and beside himself he delves into his best friend’s belongings and begins to fall in love with the woman his friend had been writing to. Her name is Ashley and she is the type of woman who steals his breath away.

Three days later, Ben walks out of the prison and into a snowy day.

Out of the corner of his eye he can make out an anxious Ashley who seems confused as the last prisoner exits and her love isn’t among the men. Guilt ridden Ben becomes his best friend and promises that he won’t spoil this girl’s holidays. Just as they are getting friendly Ben comes face to face with Ashley’s sadistic brother and is forced to partake in a high stakes casino robbery.

Reindeer Games is good, could have been an excellent thriller if it had a deeper script. But from what director John Frankenheimer and his stars had to work with they pulled off quite an entertaining film.

Frankenheimer’s last movie was the very entertaining “Ronin” which had great mood and action. The biggest surprise of the film has to be Theron and without giving anything away shows a lot of depth and diversity as she did in “Three Days in the Valley.”

Theron continues her growing as an actor and scene stealing films from the stars. Reindeer Games also allows Affleck to show that he can be as charismatic and bankable as his shadow Matt Damon and that he could easily be an up incoming action star.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Written: February 29, 2000

Retro Review: Panic Room

The walls are closing in. I can’t breathe. Please get me out of here! These phrases are probably very familiar to people who are claustrophobic. The thoughts and associations with this fear are very difficult to bring forth to the silver screen. Well unless you are in a submarine movie like “Das Boot”.

In the new film “Panic Room”, Jodie Foster stars as Meg Altman, a woman who has recently been estranged from her husband Stephen Altman (Patrick Bauchau) and is looking for a safe home to live. Her teenage daughter, Sarah (Kristen Stewart), is trying to help her mother get through her estrangement.

Meg and Sarah find a very large New York Brownstone that seems to be the perfect place to live. It was previously owned by a reclusive millionaire and has a very peculiar room. This room is small, quaint, and full of television monitors. The room is also packed with emergency gear and incased in steel. The real-estate agent refers to this room as the “panic room”. The Altman’s doubt they will ever need it.

Meg and Sarah move in and on their first night their safety will be put to the test as their home is invaded by three burglars in search of a hidden fortune. The burglars are headed by Burnham (Forest Whitaker), who seems to have connections to the house, next is the very slimy punk Junior (Jared Leto), and last is Raoul (a ski-masked Dwight Yoakum) who could be the scariest of them all and hired by Junior.

What will Meg do to ensure her daughter’s safety? What are the burglars after and how do they know it’s in that house? How will the events surrounding the “panic room” be resolved?

“Panic Room” is directed by David Fincher. Fincher’s style and interesting direction has really got him noticed in Hollywood circles as he has brought interesting looks to other Fincher films such as “Se7en”, “Fight Club” and “Alien 3″. His dark demeanor coupled with ricocheting camera angles are vintage Fincher.

In “Panic Room”, Fincher re-teams with his cinematographers from “Se7en” and delivers some very interesting and captivating shots that really deliver a “claustrophobic” feel. I liked the dashing across cupboards and counters then ascending through the floorboards.

Some of those shots reminded me of how Fincher photographed “Alien 3″. The camera dashing down tunnels from the viewpoint of the alien in that sequel really came to mind. But in those shots you really do feel like a “fly-on-the-wall”.

Jodie Foster has always rubbed me the wrong way as an actress but in some ways I enjoyed her performance as the mother.

During the film’s finale, I had a hard time believing her but during the scenes where she is in the bathtub and with the cops I really felt for her character.

The role of the mother was originally supposed to be played by Nicole Kidman who had to drop out when she was injured during filming of “Moulin Rouge”.

As for the burglars, Forest Whitaker plays the same kind of role he has played in the past. Leto is very slimy and very effective but the film really never lets the character flourish. Yoakum’s Raoul is slimier than Leto and reminded me a lot of the abusive husband he played in “Slingblade”.

The film’s screenwriter David Koepp is usually a really good script-whiz but in Panic he doesn’t really dig deep into the psychosis of these characters. In a thriller, we really need to know how these people think. I also was baffled to see literally no plot-twists throughout the whole film. Koepp’s script needed some help in maintaining the intensity but when you put 3-inch steel between predator and prey it gets very tough.

I really enjoyed how the film was photographed but it’s nearly impossible to maintain “claustrophobic” tension for almost two hours. The situations and conflicts between the mother and the burglars run out of steam half way through the picture. By that time all I really wanted was out of the “Panic Room”.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Written: April 2, 2002

Movie Review: How to Train Your Dragon

Dreamworks Animation has always played the simpler hand. Go for the laughs and never wow with the animation. Sure their films were in CGI animation but they never had a wow factor.

Take the Shrek films for example, those films are more about the parody of fairy tales and the relationships between the characters than anything else. Madagascar and Kung Fu Panda were all just for laughs. Etc, etc.

Sure Dreamworks piled in the money and really why did they ever have to change. Dreamworks made fancy feature length cartoons while their competitor made movies that happen to be animated. There is a big difference.

HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON is the first Dreamworks movie to rival a Pixar film. If I didn’t know it was a Dreamworks film I could have sworn it was made by Pixar.

Based on a famous children’s book, Dragon features a young misunderstood Viking named Hiccup (voiced by Jay Baruchel) who will do anything he can to prove he is a man.

To become a warrior in his village, Hiccup has to defeat a dragon so he creates an invention that will capture a dragon to prove his worth.

Hiccup succeeds but can’t go along with killing the dragon. He decides to study the dragon and help it. He even creates a harness so he can ride the dragon.

When his secret is revealed, Hiccup must choose between his new best friend or his tribe.

HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON is a magical ride. It has great humor, a great story and gorgeous animation. The scenes between the dragon and Hiccup are priceless. I like the fact that the filmmakers decided not to make the dragons talks so that the story was more a boy and his dog. For once in an animated movie not every animal has to talk. I like that they also didn’t give Hiccup some annoying chattering sidekick.

Don’t get me wrong he has some friends in the movie that could be considered sidekicks but they are no where near the word annoying. They are relatable and well make Hiccup more interesting.

The animation, camera angles and the dragon flying sequences are breathtaking. Those flying sequences are quite fun in 3D. Yes, we all have those flying dragon scenes from Avatar fresh in our minds. But this is a whole different animal (pardon the pun) these are classic dragons and this one just tells the story and doesn’t bang you over the head with it’s environmental message.

This animated adventure relies on the story and focuses on man’s fascination with animals. This is treasure of a little movie and my hat is off to Dreamworks I didn’t know you had it in you. Look out Pixar, a couple more like this and your monopoly on great animated films might just evaporate. This film is way better than at least four Pixar films. Guess which ones?

4.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer

Retro Review: Over the Hedge

In 2006 we saw exactly one CGI-animated feature film being released every month.

There have been some real disasters but “Over the Hedge” is one not to be missed.

“Over the Hedge” follows the misadventures of a group of woodland creatures who discover that a giant hedge is now separating them from the manicured lawns of suburbia.

RJ (Bruce Willis), a feisty raccoon sees an opportunity when the woodland creatures begin to become freaked out by the hedge.

Their leader Verne (Garry Shandling) quickly explains to his fellow creatures that they can still gather enough food for winter.

His plan seems to calm them down until RJ enters the picture. RJ introduces the creatures to all the different delicious kinds of food they can steal with little effort at all.

They are quickly sold and Verne is beside himself. What is RJ’s master plan? Does he have another agenda?

“Over the Hedge” is probably one of the most enjoyable computer-animated films coming from Dreamworks. It’s definitely better than “Madagascar” and “Shrek 2”. What this film remembers is that adults also like these kinds of films and that the humor has to be aimed at adults and kids alike.

My favorite character in the film is probably Steve Carell as the hyper-active Hammy the squirrel. He is utterly hilarious and such a scene-stealing little character.

I really enjoyed “Over the Hedge” because after the onslaught of mediocre animated films, Hedge reminded me they can still be a lot of fun if done properly.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Weird Review: Rollerball

In the mid 1970s, a cult film called “Rollerball” burst onto the scene and the film was the first real film to tackle the concept of nihilistic sports entertainment and sports corruption.

The film was set in the future and followed the exploits of a man called Jonathan E. (James Caan) who rises to become the immortal star athlete of the sport, “Rollerball”. Jonathan eventually topples his corrupt masters. It was sort of “Gladiator” for a lost generation.

Flash forward to the 2002 version and we now have a central figure known as Jonathan Cross (Chris Klein) who is thrust into a corrupt blood-thirsty sport hidden within deepest and darkest Central Asia. The fall of the Soviet Union and the struggling people seem to have embraced the lethal sport, “Rollerball”, as a release from the pains of reality.

The sport itself is a mixture of “WWF wrestling”, “grunge roller derby” and the “gladiatorial escapades” of Ancient Rome. Jonathan’s companions during his “gladiatorial struggle” are Marcus (LL Cool J) and Aurora (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos). They are just as stuck as Jonathan.

The vicious overlord of the sport is Petrovich (Jean Reno) who wants take his sport global even it means killing the athletes on the track to boost ratings.

The brilliant concept in the original cult film is utterly lost in the remake. The film’s edgy editing and camera angles try to embrace the “Fast & Furious” take of the story. The flash and pathetic story translates into a gouging “cheeseball” of a film. This could be the cheesiest film of the last ten years. Cheesiest is when a film at no point ever apologizes or tries to climb over how bad it is. Most bad films know they are but do have more than one blemish of brilliance.

In the original film my biggest problem was the game itself. I liked the idea of a sports figure overthrowing a corrupt sports executive but the sport itself was so utterly boring. What was the allure of roller derby as a sport anyhow? I never understood the rules or why it was so popular? In the remake we have the same boring game but we have a wrestling element added. The games themselves seem to go on forever.

I would have liked to see the filmmakers remake the “Rollerball” concept but drop the “brain-numbing” sport where it takes place. This film could have been incredible if the sport was say “hockey”. Now that could be an incredible film. Can you imagine the blood, gladiatorial uniforms and corruption spray-painted onto a corrupt hockey-game?

The acting in this film is so cardboard and woody that you could probably watch the grass on your front lawn grow and be more entertained. Klein has always been the naïve, clueless pretty-boy and he doesn’t stray from that here. Cool J is a decent rapper turned actor but he should really shoot his agent for putting him in these stinkers.

Rebecca Romijn-Stamos impressed me with her portrayal of “Mystique” in “X-Men” but her accent in this film is probably as bad as Nicolas Cage’s in “Capt. Corelli”. One thing I couldn’t understand was why she took the role. She is nude for nearly half of her off-court scenes but the filmmakers decided to digitally manipulate the shadows so her body is covered.

Why didn’t they just clothe her and preserve some of this poor girl’s dignity? I hate films when they censor the film making itself. Why film it that way if you are just going to turn around and cover it up later?

The only real fun in this film is the opening sequence which involves Jonathan Cross in a “street-luging” event through the hilly streets of San Francisco. Other than that it goes downhill from there. Beyond that there really is no redeeming feature whatsoever.

(0.5 of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Written: February 18, 2002

Retro Review: Cinderella Man

There is a great boxing story about a miracle heavy-weight champion who brought hope to a nation filled with hopelessness. His passion and will to win allowed for many people to find the will to survive the darkest hours of the Great Depression. His name was James Braddock and this is his story.

James Braddock (Russell Crowe) is probably not a name a lot of people are familiar with and for most of his less-than illustrious career people just knew Braddock as a washed-up boxer.

Braddock’s manager, Joe Gould (Paul Giamatti) had given up trying to get Braddock back in the ring until a heavyweight bout fell through and a contender needed an opponent to fill an already cluttered card.

Braddock saw the opportunity to turn his bad luck around and finally pull up his family’s spirits. Braddock’s wife, Mae (Renee Zellweger) was very reluctant to have her husband take up boxing again to put food on the table. But for Braddock this was his last best chance to shine one more immortal time.

“Cinderella Man” is basically what the title constitutes it to be. There are no shocks, dismays, twists or turns here. It’s just basically a rah-rah story about an unlikely underdog who has one more shot at greatness. Basically it’s Rocky 8, set in the 1930s.

What probably makes the film engaging is the strong performance from both Zellweger and Giamatti. I liked that the film showed the impact of boxing on Braddock’s wife as well as on Braddock himself. There was some of support angle in the Rocky series but Zellweger is just so good here. Giamatti is always an amazing talent to watch and his role as the manager and agent allows him to dance circles around Crowe’s slobbering, daunting and shallow hero.

The set design, direction and feel of the film was all top-notch. I did really love how the film subtly shows how the Braddock family drifted into the Great Depression. It’s an amazing transformation. Another thing I really enjoyed was the performance of the maniacal champion Max Baer, played by Craig Bierko. This is probably Bierko’s best performance to date.

I really did feel that “Cinderella Man” was nothing more than another boxing film with an all-star cast. But it’s the performances that make the film worth seeing. Sure there is plenty of déjà vu in this film but sometimes you just need an underdog to cheer for.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Bruce Almighty

The fate of the world rests in the hands of a television journalist? Perish the thought.

Jim Carrey stars as Bruce Nolan, a human-interests television journalist who is at his wit’s end when he loses his dream job and nearly his life.

Bruce condemns God (Morgan Freeman) for making him have such a crappy life. Bruce challenges God that he could do God’s job better.

Bruce should have been careful what he wished for because that is exactly what happens. Jennifer Aniston stars as Bruce’s overly supportive girlfriend, Grace.

“Bruce Almighty” is vintage Carrey when it wants to be. But there seems to be two films locked inside one.

One of these films wants to be a fable while the other wants to unleash the rubber-man inside Carrey. Ironically this scenario is a lot like Carrey’s real-life. The problem with these two identities slugging it out is that only one can win.

The times where the film is slapstick Carrey at his best are a riot. The scenes where he parts his tomato soup or making a newscaster have a case of involuntary babbling are hysterical and right out of the Carrey handbook. But when the film sinks back to Earth and it tries to make the film a fable/romantic-comedy, you just want to gag.

Freeman’s performance of God is very subtle and reminded me some of the way George Burns played his “almighty” in the classic “Oh! God” series. Which brings me to another question, why is there so much religious protest for this film when there have been other films with actors playing holy figures. Come on, Warren Beatty played an angel or even Willem Dafoe as Jesus.

If these things were screened before they had a chance to protest the film. That might settle doubts, you be the judge.

I loved “Bruce Almighty” for about 35 minutes then I just wanted more of Carrey being Carrey. It really is a shame that a man with so much raw rubbery-humor dwelling inside him has such a split personality both on and off screen.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.