Retro Review: The Island

Could “The Island” be that “Logan’s Run” remake we have all been waiting for?

“The Island” stars Ewan McGregor as Lincoln Six-Echo, a man who lives in a perfect, yet very strict environment. His utopian world is filled with duties and routines which Lincoln begins to question. How does his perfect world actually operate?

The only real salvation that Lincoln and the people of his controlled world have is a daily lottery where winners are whisked off to the mythical paradise “the island” to live the rest of their lives in freedom. Where is this “island” and what do you do when you get there?

The more questions Lincoln raises the more he begins to doubt his surroundings until he learns that he is in fact living a lie and that he is a clone. Lincoln grabs fellow resident and his friend Jordan Two-Delta (Scarlett Johansson) and they begin to run for their lives. Together they will find out all the secrets that their world hides.

“The Island” is one of those films that the less you know going in the better the experience it will be. The problem with that kind of film is that it’s very hard to market especially when you have a high-profile director like Michael Bay at the helm.

The opening and experiences that Lincoln Six-Echo encounters while still within the utopian society are interesting and really draw you in. Director Michael Bay’s restraint here is actually impressive where we begin to see a story with real substance and he allows his actors to act.

I really enjoyed McGregor and Johansson as the leads in this film and the humanity they bring to their characters. McGregor is one of the most intriguing actors working in Hollywood today and this proves it once again. I can’t imagine what this film would have been like without him. Can you imagine a hack like Colin Farrell in this role? Perish the thought.

The production design and basic plot elements reminded me a lot of the sci-fi classic “Logan’s Run” where the utopian survivors begin to doubt that the outside world is contaminated and that their society is in fact a lie so they must run. Don’t get me wrong this isn’t a direct remake but it does house a lot of the same philosophy.

The idea of replacing the whole “dated” nuclear holocaust angle in “Logan’s Run” with this cloning angle is actually very intriguing and seems a perfect way to bring that story into our world and deliver a similar impact it had back in the 1970s.

I was enthralled by “The Island” and started to believe it was the best movie of the summer. For over an hour, I was transfixed to the screen. Then the more the film moved along the more signature Michael Bay shots I started to see. Man stepping from helicopter in slow-mo with blades whizzing above him. A cluttered freeway crash sequence ripped right out of “Bad Boys 2”. And even more explosions and bellowing action stunts that are way, way over the top.

I liked Michael Bay a lot when he was restrained from using his signature stuff and I even believed for a second that he could be a great director if given the right material. But once I started getting hit with Michael Bay mayhem I started to lose touch with the story and the characters.

Don’t get me wrong there was also some of the adrenaline junkie stuff I liked but it just seemed tiresome and routine especially the truck sequence.

Surprisingly the product placement in the film didn’t bug me as much as it has been talked about. There are some scenes where I did notice it but for me it wasn’t any worse than it was in “Minority Report”.

I liked “The Island” and a lot of what it had to offer but I think the film should have stuck more with the story and less with the explosions.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Click

How we all yearn to control our lives more. Stop enjoy the beautiful moments, skip the uncomfortable situations and advance past the work day so we can get some quality time with the people we love.

As many pop-singers and philosophers have uttered, “Life’s a journey, not a destination.” But it’s those in between moments that make us who we are.

In the new sci-fi comedy “Click”, Adam Sandler stars as Michael Newman, a workaholic architect who has a beautiful often-neglected wife (Kate Beckinsale) and two pint-sized children. Newman’s life definitely isn’t all roses as he often has to bend over backwards to please his pompous boss (David Hasselhoff) in hopes of one day getting that promotion.

Newman’s life changes dramatically when he buys a mysterious universal remote control from the “Beyond” section at Bed, Bath and Beyond. All Newman was looking for was a remote to take the place of all the controls he has at home. He had no idea he would end up with a remote that mutes the dog, pauses his wife and fast-forwards past all the conflict in his life.

Newman thinks all he has to do now is fast-forward to the good stuff and he can live happily ever after. Well that just isn’t the case.

“Click” is a very cute concept at first glance and there are great little “Bruce Almighty” and “Back to the Future” styled moments in the film but the film’s middle is less heavy on jokes and more on telling the moral of the story. It takes itself way to serious and forgets how much fun of a concept the film has to play with.

Adam Sandler is very much his rough, loud-mouthed average guy that everyone has liked in his previous comedies. But in some scenes in this film he felt a little too insensitive for what was trying to be said.

Also why wasn’t there a slo-mo scene involving Sandler’s affections for Beckinsale. He always seemed to fast-forward past her even though in the very next scene he cries out his unconditional love for her. If anyone deserved a slo-mo scene it’s Beckinsale.

Hasselhoff is good as the pompous boss, Beckinsale is quite underused, Sean Astin is the butt of the joke and well Henry Winkler as Sandler’s dad just seemed to fit.

I liked how the world of the remote was done in the film and enjoyed the whole entire concept. I just wish the execution would have been more fun.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Cable summer premiere dates (courtesy: The Live Feed – THR)

SOURCE: Cable summer premiere dates — The Live Feed | THR.

Royal-pains-01June 3

Burn Notice (USA), 9 p.m.

Royal Pains (USA), 10 p.m.

June 6

The Hard Times of RJ Berger (MTV), 10 p.m.

Drop Dead Diva (Lifetime), 9 p.m.

June 8

Pretty Little Liars (ABC Family), 8 p.m.

June 13

True Blood (HBO), 9 p.m.

June 15

Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List (Bravo), 9 p.m.

True-blood-03-mine_03June 16

Top Chef (Bravo), 9 p.m.

June 20

Leverage (TNT), 9 p.m.

June 22

Hawthorne (TNT), 9 p.m.

Memphis Beat (TNT), 10 p.m.

June 24

Futurama (Comedy Central), 10 p.m.

June 27

Hung (HBO), 10 p.m.

Entourage (HBO), 10:30 p.m.

Entourage407_09_0June 29

Rescue Me (FX), 10 p.m.

Louie (FX), 11 p.m.

July 9

Eureka (Syfy), 9 p.m.
Haven (Syfy), 10 p.m.

July 11

Children’s Hospital (Adult Swim), 10:30 p.m.

The-closer-412-03July 12

The Closer (TNT), 9 p.m.

July 13

White Collar (USA), 9 p.m.

Covert Affairs (USA), 10 p.m.

July 14

Psych (USA), 10 p.m.

July 24

Being Human (BBC America)

July 25

Mad Men (AMC), 10 p.m.

My Boys (TBS),

Aug. 1

Rubicon (AMC)

Amd_weedsAug. 16

Weeds (Showtime), 10 p.m.

The Big C (Showtime), 10:30 p.m.

Aug. 17

Melissa & Joey (ABC Family), 8 p.m.

Aug. 20

Kids in the Hall: Death Comes to Town (IFC)

Retro Review: Daredevil

When I was a mere squirt of about 13 years old, a comic book taught me a few lessons that I haven’t forgotten to this day. This comic book was Daredevil.

The new feature film based on the popular Marvel Comics character, Daredevil, stars Ben Affleck as attorney-vigilante Matt Murdock who prowls the roof-tops of New York’s Hell’s Kitchen in a search to preserve and maintain justice.

The film opens with a bloodied and battered Daredevil falling into a church much to a preacher’s surprise. This event springboards the filmgoer back into the character’s past where young Matt lives with his struggling boxer father Jack Murdock (David Keith).

When Matt is blinded in a freak accident, a new connection develops between father and son. But it seems that Matt has adopted some extraordinary powers that leave his remaining 4 remaining senses in a sort of hyper-flux. He also develops a sort of radar sense that allows him to see in a whole new way.

After Matt’s father is killed following a crooked boxing match, Matt devotes his life to justice. He becomes an attorney. When the worst cases slip through the system, Matt dons a crimson leather suit and exacts his own brand of justice as the vigilante, Daredevil.

One day when Daredevil comes to close to uncovering the truth about organized crime in Hell’s Kitchen he becomes hunted by the self-made crimelord Kingpin (Michael Clarke Duncan). Kingpin hires the assassin-with-perfect-aim Bullseye (Colin Farrell) to take down Daredevil but Matt’s new girlfriend Elektra Natchios (Jennifer Garner) becomes reluctantly involved. How will this new dynamic and showdown effect “the man without fear”? Can a mere attorney from Hell’s Kitchen bring down one of the most powerful crimelords in New York?

This is one of the hardest reviews I have ever had to write. I have struggled to look at this film without my admiration with the comic. I have found that impossible. The film is based on the legendary Frank Miller storyline from the 1980s, which changed the lives of the ones who read it forever. How could a comic influence and change a reader so much? Isn’t that left only for novels? Well for anyone who doesn’t enjoy comics or know that comics are for grown-ups, that maybe the truth.

Daredevil, the film incarnate moves along very briskly in its 103-minute time frame. Because of time restraints, it seems Kingpin and Elektra have been over simplified. For fans of the comic, these changes may be annoying since each character is so multi-layered and intricate for the plot. For the basic moviegoer it maybe all right. I may never know.

I loved the look of Daredevil; the dark, grisly feel is such homage to the comic. I also loved how some of the scenes reminded me so much of favorite panels from the comics. I loved how the film depicted Daredevil and how he was in constant conflict with his faith. I also cheered the aspect of Murdock needing a sensory depravation-tank. How else is he able to escape his heightened senses. I thought there was a lot of depth in Affleck’s portrayal of Matt Murdock. He even surprised me.

I also loved the depiction and portrayal of both Daredevil and Bullseye. Bullseye, character-wise, reminded me so much of his comic version. Colin Farrell’s performance as Bullseye was a real treat in the film.

I had a lot of problems with the portrayals of Elektra and Kingpin. The audience needs to know more about them before it can connect with them. Even as a die-hard fan I found it difficult to follow the film-versions. It was as if Joel Schumacher had written these characters. Who is Elektra? Why should we care about her? How deep does the Kingpin’s influence go? What is his motive?

I really think that with a longer running time, the film could have been more of a success. Maybe the DVD will shed some light on that. I just hope that the power, emotion and life lessons I learned as a kid will be seen some day. Daredevil is a success but not a rampant one.

Theatrical Cut: 3 out of 5

Director’s Cut: 4 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer.

Movie Review: Prince of Persia: Sands of Time

Like sands through an hourglass, so are the days of our lives. Well, that seems to be the case with Persian lives anyhow.

The new potential blockbuster from super-producer Jerry Bruckheimer stars Jake Gyllenhaal as a titular hero Dastan, an Arabian peasant boy rescued and raised by a king. Flashforward years later, Dastan is leading an invasion into a holy city which is rumored to be holding WMDs. (Remember this is set around the same time as Sinbad or Aladdin so they are a WMD equivilent of the time).

The city being invaded by Dastan also holds many secrets and is ruled by the most beautiful princess in the land (Gemma Arterton). (Of course it is??!!) Along for the ride are Dastan’s two squabbling brothers (who are actual princes) (Toby Kebbell and Richard Coyle) and his uncle (Ben Kingsley). It is an easy victory and Dastan wins.

He is honored by the king for his bravery but during the ceremony Dastan is betrayed and forced into exile. For the rest of the film, Dastan is on the run with the stuck-up princess and a dagger that can freeze time for only a couple minutes. He has to clear his name and find out who betrayed him.

Okay first of all with this cast, this director and this script turning the classic video game into a movie was a blatant waste of time. I have been playing the game since it first came out in 1989. It was a beautiful game that harnessed all that was good about the Arabian Knights from Ali Baba to Sinbad to Aladdin.

It was one of my favorite games of the time and the plot was very simple. You are a hero in love with a Persian princess you must save her before an evil ruler kills her.

The ruler has given the princess an ultimatum, marry him or die in one hour. So you race to her rescue. In this version, the hero is nameless, isn’t Persian or even a prince. The title refers to what you will become if you save the Princess. Three sequels to this version of the game followed.

Finally in 2003, the series was overhauled by Canadian super game company UbiSoft with “Prince of Persia: Sands of Time”. The mega-popular relaunch also featured a nameless Prince. This time the hero is an actual Prince and is tricked by an evil Vizier to release the sands of time destroying his country and turning the people into monsters. The Prince and the Lady Farrah unchanged by the Vizier’s plan have to liberate the country and free its people by turning back the hands of time. There are no multiple princes, an Aladdin enhanced back story or a prince named Dastan.

The 2010 movie does harnass the allure of the video game with lavish sets, costumes and an impressive production design. The stunts are some of the most impressive in recent memory and even scenario is ripped right from the game itself. You could say this homage reminded me a lot of what they “tried” to do in the first Tomb Raider film.

My favorite performance in the movie was by the scene-stealing Alfred Molina who plays a morally-challenged trader that Dastan runs into.

There is no chemistry between leads Jake and Gemma. The feisty dialogue would be fun if these two actors actually liked each other. The thought of these two actually locking lips seems to have been an after thought since their kiss is tossed in during a giant battle sequence. It is almost like, “Oops we forgot to kiss! Better get that over with.”

I am not even going to get into how over-rated Gemma is as an actress. For an actress who has stolen some pretty impressive roles in recent years (RocknRolla, Quantum of Solace and last month’s Clash of the Titans), she is really very weak for an actress.

There is one scene in Prince of Persia where she is huddled in a tent telling Jake’s character about the “Gods” and how they are angry with man. I couldn’t help but burst out laughing it was like she almost got scripts mixed up between this and Clash.

There has been a lot of political backlash regarding the film and it’s casting. If it worked I wouldn’t complain but this doesn’t.

The new plot devices added to the Prince’s story make this film out to be more about a Western kingdom than an Arabian one.

If Jake had been surrounded by actual Arabian actors with exception for maybe Kingsley or Alfred Molina then I would have bought the film.

But what we get instead is a bunch of Shakespeareans spray-painted with Coppertone tans talking with British accents. Why does every kingdom or empire have to sound British and be populated by theatre actors?

Prince of Persia deserved a better adaptation than this attempt. I was so hoping for the fun of the old Arabian Knights movies, with some Pirates of the Caribbean and The Mummy thrown in for good measure. Sadly it wasn’t meant to be.

1.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer

Retro Review: Derailed

Those lonely commuter train rides really can get to us. The faceless strangers we are crunched together with as we are shuttled around until we reach our next stop. A sigh of relief as we can breathe for a minute then its back into the mosh pit we call a bus or train.

Ah, thank god, only six more stops to go. Is this you?

Well I can not imagine any of those faceless strangers look like Clive Owen or Jennifer Aniston. If they did I bet public transit would be up 80%. What, not a 100%? Well, not all of us like Owen or Aniston.

In the new film, Derailed, two faceless commuter drones (Owen and Aniston) find each other and decide to act on their mutual attraction. Who cares if they’re married, they’re attractive and well this is a movie. Oh there are the “well gosh, I don’t know, what will my husband/wife think?” and the “but kissing you felt so good” scenes and all the deafeningly thick romantic mood tension. Really is it all that romantic other than watching two attractive people smooch? Didn’t think so.

Like all “forbidden affairs” everything goes inevitably bad. This time the couple’s love tryst is invaded by a mean guy (Vincent Cassel) who seems to be cardboard cut-out of the most boring villain ever. This oh-so mean guy beats Owen to a pulp, rapes Aniston and well leaves them alive so he can bug them later.

And bugging them he does, like that gnat you can never catch. Owen in his best “aw shucks” performance lets this guy continue to make him feel less and less like a man. I never bought it.

Then in comes the “clichéd” copy boy (RZA) who works with Owen, did time in the “big house” and has to help Owen out.

There are so many clichés, dumb coincidences and goofy character reactions in this film that not for one moment did I believe Clive Owen in this flick. I never bought him as a wimp. I love Owen as an actor but here he is just so overly miscast.

I really think that Owen’s performance and character should have been more like Harrison Ford in Roman Polanski’s “Frantic”. The guy isn’t a moron and does all he can to fight back even if he is an every-day joe. Just because your every-day doesn’t mean you won’t fight. Owen is a wet noodle compared to Ford in “Frantic”.

Aniston has her moments but for the most part this is her attempt at breaking the mold role. She was a lot better in the “Good Girl” but here she finds a way to carry on some of what she built in that film. One of these days the demon sitting on her shoulder, or do I mean her agent, will stop calling her Rachel.

I really do think that this film could have been a lot more powerful and more interesting if a new director was attached. It needed a David Fincher, Alfred Hitchcock or even something sexier from say an Adrian Lyne. The film could have also used some smarter writing.

I really like Clive Owen and for the most part I think Jennifer Aniston could do drama but this isn’t a good vehicle for either party. Aniston needs to get grittier, grimier and less inhibited to finally shrug off her nice girl image. Just please Jennifer don’t call Jane Campion.

She nearly offed Nicole Kidman in “Portrait of a Lady” and sacrificed Meg Ryan to Satan with “In the Cut”. Poor Meg may never recover.

“Derailed” is an ok and rudimentary thriller but since I guessed a lot of the film’s impact 20 minutes in I was hoping it would at least deliver in performance or visually. It didn’t on either.

(2 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Old School

Written: February 25, 2003

There just comes a time in any man’s life when you have to say enough is enough. I seem to have reached my limit with the “gross-out teen” comedies.

“Old School” features three disenchanted men, Mitch, Frank and Beanie, who decide to create a fraternity in hopes of reawakening their love affair with their college days. Mitch’s (Luke Wilson) new place seems to be the perfect place for the fraternity according to Luke’s pals Beanie (Vince Vaughn) and Frank (Will Ferrell). When the best parties of the campus erupt and middle-aged men become pledges, Dean Gordon Pritchard (Jeremy Piven) makes it his mission to stop the hi-jinx.

I remember back to my college days with fond memories, I also remember watching oodles and oodles of fraternity comedies when I was a college chum. I adored the classics like “Animal House”, “Revenge of the Nerds”, “Meatballs” and “Up the Creek”. I used to howl at the hi-jinx and the nerds overcoming jocks. I even found myself reliving some of those moments when I saw last year’s “Van Wilder”. But with “Old School” I fond myself chuckling through a couple isolated scenes but found most of it to be unimaginative and boring. Have I fully grown up? Or was it the premise and the jokes were lacking? I hope it was the latter.

I loved the cinder block and tranquilizer gun scenes but found that I didn’t care about the characters at all. Why was this in such a basic comedy?

I think that I have become weary of these kinds of movies. This film so wants to be the “Animal House” of the next generation but it doesn’t have the flair or interesting characters that filled that movie to the rafters. Comedies like these need colorful and bold characters, which we can relate to. We also need them so we can appreciate when the “loveable losers” overcome the trying of odds. This is quite evident in the other classics like “Revenge of the Nerds”.

“Old School” is a painful trip down memory lane. Recommended for the college crowd only. The rest of us can relive these memories with the classics.

(2.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Shaft

Written: June 19, 2000

The greatest blaxpolitation hero returns with a new face and that same old attitude and style for a whole new generation.

The title of the film “Shaft” refers to the title character John Shaft (now played by Samuel L Jackson) who in the early seventies captivated audiences with his cool attitude, no nonsense style and brutal approach to law enforcement. In this latest film, Shaft tries to bring down a white supremacist (Christian Bale) who has brutally clubbed a black guy to death.

The key to the case lies with a cocktail waitress (Toni Collette) who witnessed the murder. If Shaft can track her down and keep her alive long enough he may finally bring the bad guy down. The only thing standing is his way is a vindictive drug dealer (Jeffrey Wright) hired by the supremacist to kill the witness.

All the brilliance of the original “Shaft” is here except its been streamlined and evolved into a great looking action film. The film has great performances from Samuel L Jackson, Jeffrey Wright and Christian Bale.

Jackson is perfectly cast as the attitude filled Shaft. One small problem I had with his casting was some of his scenes reminded me of the character he played in “Pulp Fiction”.

Bale is amazing as the brutal bad guy who finds there are worse evils than he can deliver. This is Bale’s second key role as a devilish villain in a row. I think he has the potential to travel the route James Woods has taken with his career. Boy, has he changed since “Newsies”. Anyone remember that film?

Finally I was really impressed with relative new-comer Jeffrey Wright who plays the perfect druglord scumbag. He made his motion picture debut 10 years ago with “Presumed Innocent” but has since made a name for himself on Broadway where he was awarded a Tony award in 1994 for the 7 hour play, “Angels in America – Perestroika” . Wright was so believable that I had to see him on the Tonight Show before I could get that character out of my head.

The way the film is put together and synchronized is really nice to see. This is the pure atmosphere that makes us fondly remember those cult films of seventies. I have always loved the Isaac Hayes “Shaft” theme song. Another atmospheric marvel within Shaft is that this film pays homage to genre by embracing what it was instead of making fun of it. Another breath of fresh air had to be there was no cliched woman love interest for the hero. Blaxpolitation is finally becoming cool.

I really only had a couple problems with Shaft. One being the excessive amount of bad language but that is just a warning to the people who may be sensitive to that nature. Another was I felt was the miss use of the female leads. Vanessa Williams and even Collette seemed to be dumbed down and fade into the background. I feel sorry for them and wished they were given a little more depth. Pose this question: What would happen if Shaft met a 90′s woman? I welcome the return to the 70s Shaft brings to me. I love his no holds barred approach. Wonder if we’ll see a sequel?

(4 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Bless the Child

A heroin addict’s child could be the savior of man but first she must face a series of temptations sent by Lucifer himself.

Kim Basinger stars in “Bless the Child” a story that centers upon a childless mother who is forced to look after an abandoned child after her sister leaves the child. Basinger’s sister is a desperate drug addict who has no idea who the father is but knows very well that she can’t care for the child.

As the child grows into a preteen, Basinger becomes more and more convinced that the mother will never return. When the child is diagnosed as being autistic, the estranged mother reappears with a mysterious husband (Rufus Sewell), who runs a self help institute that specializes in runaways. Convinced that the mother and husband can now take care of the child they take the child from Basinger.

While this struggle is going on the city is immersed in the grip of a child serial killer and an FBI liaison (Jimmy Smits) is dispatched to help with the case. His main focus is ritual killings and it appears the victims are being sacrificed in a search for the child of the Second Coming.

Is Basinger’s neice the next Christ figure? Is she apart of some grander scheme? These are questions the movie delves into as Sewell becomes quite a villainous figure in his pursuit to uncover this truth.

“Bless the Child” is a film that Hollywood seems to always return to. The idea of the “Second Coming” but this time they have clouded it with a recently over-used “put the child in jeopardy” thriller formula. Its kind of “End of Days” meets “Mercury Rising”. This film is a lot more subtler than a lot of religious based thrillers of recent years and really tries to bring a perfect vision of “divine intervention” to the film and its characters. I would be curious to see how this film would play to a lot of Christians and what would their reactions be?

A few amazing visuals perfectly capture the vision of demons and angels. But the “rat-demon” boggles my mind on why that effect was necessary. Wouldn’t Rufus Sewell’s devilish performance be enough unholy enough for the plot and the religious finale? I often wondered what it would have been like if Sewell and Smits had switched roles.

All Smits had to work with here was a clone of his NYPD Blue character. Smits’ good looks and presence could have ignited the villain and been a great character for the actor. I have always loved Sewell and he always plays a great reluctant hero who is struggling with his inner self. But here he just isn’t convincing as a devil trying to turn the child to his side of thinking.

What is sad about this whole scenario is that you can’t help but snicker that Sewell is working for the “dark side”. I know Sewell is a lot better hero than a villain from some of his other great movies which include “Dark City” and “Dangerous Beauty”. If you haven’t seen those I recommend them highly.

With “Bless the Child” being Basinger’s second film since her Oscar win I really think she still has yet to prove why she won her Oscar. At this moment in time, I am tending to be placing her in the Oscar category with Geena Davis and Marisa Tomei. These three actresses probably stole Oscar from some better actresses thus creating the category. I guess only time will tell.

(2.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Nacho Libre

That zany Jack Black is at it again. He’s rocked the school, questioned our taste in music and chased a giant gorilla. Now he’s taking on the Mexican world of professional wrestling as a masked luchador.

Black stars as Ignacio, a lovesick monk who is infatuated with the new nun, Sister Encarnación (Ana de la Reguera), who has come to the orphanage he has called home since he was a small boy. She lights up Ignacio’s mundane world of cooking for the monks and the orphans.

Ignacio’s secret desire is to impress the Sister and deliver wonderful meals for the children of the orphanage. Ignacio hatches a plan to do just that.

When he was a boy, Ignacio dreamed of being a luchador or Mexican wrestler. He wanted it so much. Ignacio decides that he would wrestle for the children and steal the heart of his beloved.

Teaming with an unlikely partner, Ignacio embarks on his quest. Many trials face our lone monk but there is a lesson to be had.

On so many levels, Nacho is probably one of the goofiest and dim-witted comedies you are sure to see all year. But what seems to give it credit is the outrageous and over-the-top performance of Jack Black. He is wonderful in the title role and this is coming from a guy who wasn’t a Jack Black fan ever.

With its zany concept, loose plot, innocent direction and simplistic dialogue, Nacho is definitely not a comedy for everyone but it’s kind of funny because it made me smile to a point.

The film runs out of steam about half way in and I found that the jokes were wearing thin and the love story just never gels.
How could it? We are talking about a nun and a monk.

I was impressed by the restrained but eloquent performance of Ana de la Reguera, who must have had a difficult job trying to keep her demeanor when acting opposite Black.

I also loved the film’s musical score. It just fit on so many levels especially Ignacio’s central theme which I am still humming in my mind.

The film isn’t brilliant nor do I fully recommend it. But what it has going for it is originality, zany performances and the most unlikely of costumed heroes.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.