Retro Review: Legally Blonde

“Clueless” goes to law school. Who says innocence can’t become a lawyer.

Elle, a very innocent and ditsy blonde bombshell (Reese Witherspoon) watches her perfect life vaporize when her perfect man (Matthew Davis) decides he needs to move his career and lifestyle to stuffy Harvard Law.

Convinced her only chance to save her perfect relationship, Elle does all she can to get into Harvard. Will Elle succeed? How will this perfect Malibu princess fit in at Harvard?

From the opening to the finale, Blonde reminded me a lot of Amy Heckerling’s “Clueless”. What made Blonde as good as Clueless was that it didn’t pay homage but instead embraced the concept. A comparison will be obviously made between star Reese Witherspoon and Clueless star Alicia Silverstone. This is a natural comparison since their characters are very close to that same person. Cher (Silverstone in Clueless) is probably a little less shallow than Witherspoon’s Elle. However the film does bring Elle pretty close to the self-awareness that Cher does have.

Both girls pray the central figure to perfection making it extremely hard for your eyes off the screen. Witherspoon is flawless in her portrayal of Elle and breathes glorious wit, innocence and beauty as she immerses herself in the Elle character.

Blonde doesn’t sink to use gross-out humor gags but instead uses the beloved “fish-out-of-water” concept. The film also lest the central figure’s innocence shine through. The film doesn’t spoil Elle and her uniqueness instead it allows the character to appear dumber than she actually is. This embrace of the innocence is exactly what the film needed. This also allows Elle to be neither offensive nor insulting to others. Witherspoon is brilliant.

If you are quick you may notice that there are some reunions of sorts in the film. Reese Witherspoon and Selma Blair starred in Cruel Intentions. Matthew Davis starred with Jessica Cauffiel (Margot) in “Urban Legends: Final Cut”. Finally Reese Witherspoon starred with Alanna Ubach (Serena) in the cult hit “Freeway”.

My slightest problems were with the film’s ending. It wrapped up so quickly and the film seemed to a take a different tone as Brooke Taylor (Ali Larter) was put on trial. Before we know it the ending is upon us. I wished my visit with Elle was a little longer but that’s the way romantic comedies work.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Alex & Emma

Director Rob Reiner, Kate Hudson and Luke Wilson have decided to square-off
against a green-skinned behemoth. They are packing a weapon to help stall the
green goliath. What is their secret weapon? Heart-strings, of course.

Alex (Luke Wilson) is a starving-blocked writer who must finish his follow-up to
his best-selling novel in 30 days or risk being pummeled to death by two large
Cubans. Enter Emma (Kate Hudson), a stenographer who is aspiring to work at a
prestigious law firm until she is duped into showing up at Alex’s door.

Their first meeting isn’t exactly heavenly but eventually Emma decides to help
desperate Alex. Can their team-up and collaboration save Alex from certain doom? And what the hell is Alex’s book about anyway? 

Director Rob Reiner ventures back into the foray of romantic comedies with “Alex & Emma”. Reiner is still most fondly remembered for directing “When Harry Met Sally”, which is regarded as one of, if not the best romantic comedy of all time.

Even though “Alex & Emma” isn’t going to be remembered as a classic it does have its tender and sweet side. There are some delightful moments for Hudson who takes on four roles for this film. In each of her incarnations you do have to
crack a grin because she has such a beautiful and infectious way with the
camera. This kind of role for Kate reminded me a lot of her mother, Goldie Hawn, in her earlier work. It is amazing how much of Goldie is in her daughter.

I also liked seeing Luke Wilson in a leading role. Wilson is always so laid back and very comfortable on screen and you get this coming home feeling when he’s on screen. My only problem with Wilson is that he needs to develop a range in his career. He always seems to be playing the same guy.

I have to remark on Sophie Marceau in this film as well. Like Monica Bellucci
after her, Marceau is one of Europe’s great imports. Marceau is a brilliant
French actress and she needs to be used more in Hollywood. I liked her as the
tormented socialite in the 1920s here. The film just didn’t support her
character.

The sad thing about “Alex & Emma” is that I was more interested in the goings-on
within Alex’s novel than what was happening between the writer and his typist.
It was almost like “The Great Gatsby” which really intrigued me. There was so
much potential for the conflict between the real-world and novel-world. I wanted
to see more of a struggle. The filmmakers could have had so much fun with that.

“Alex & Emma” is a delightfully basic comedy, which doesn’t capitalize on what
it could be. The performances and leads are memorable but not poignant.

However it is a great movie to get brownie points, guys.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Ice Age: The Meltdown

Back in 2002, computer animated films were just starting to take off and we hadn’t seen the likes of “Finding Nemo” and “The Incredibles”. 20th Century Fox and Blue Sky Studios stepped into the ring with a new style of CGI animation and we all witnessed the dawn of “Ice Age”.

The film followed a sloth (John Leguizamo), a woolly mammoth (Ray Romano) and a saber-toothed tiger (Denis Leary) as they tried to bring a young infant back to his tribe after he is lost during a migration.

The innocence of the child and the wise-cracking of the animals made the film a fun and entertaining journey. In some ways it almost felt like “The Jungle Book” with snow.

On top of all this was an acorn-obsessed rodent named Scrat who opened the picture with a Looney Tunes inspired short.

Now in 2006, we come to the sequel which finds the trio at the end of the Ice Age as the world starts to melt. This time they have to escape the flood, team-up with 2 possums and convince another mammoth (Queen Latifah) that she is not a possum.

I have to say that “Ice Age 2” isn’t as thought out or as well conceived as its predecessor and it shows a lack of structured story-telling. There are actually 2 films in this sequel, you have the story of the trio interlaced with Scrat trying to still capture his acorn. It’s kind of like having an 80 minute Bugs Bunny movie interlaced every 7 minutes with a Road Runner segment. It is distracting.

The whole mammoth thinking it’s a possum is purely for kids but it will be kind of annoying for the adults. I would imagine its like trying to pry that dud, “Barnyard” from your psyche.

This one is perfect for the kids but I think its missing something this time around for the adults. But maybe it’s just me.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer

Retro Review: Ice Age

Twentieth Century Fox jumps into the computer-animation arena with the new animated film “Ice Age”. The film tells the story of four “sub-zero heroes” who team up to escort an adorable and very lost baby back to his tribe.

First there is Diego (Denis Leary), a saber-toothed tiger who is harboring a secret. Second is Sid (John Leguizamo), a sloth who won’t stop talking. Third there is Manfred (Ray Romano), a woolly mammoth who is searching for a new family. Fourth and finally there is Scrat, a cross between a squirrel and a rat who is obsessed with eating an acorn that keeps eluding him.

“Ice Age” is another adorable family movie that features some very memorable cast members. Scrat steals the show as he sort of pays homage to those lovable “Looney Tunes” of yesteryear through hilarious slapstick gags. He was the funniest and my favorite.

I also enjoyed Denis Leary’s very out of character turn in this animated film. His voice just seemed to fit that scraggily tiger. Romano as the steadfast mammoth is a typical depiction of an elephant like seen in “Disney’s The Jungle Book”. Leguizamo’s Sid is probably the second funniest character on the squad and makes you howl when Scrat isn’t on film.

The film talks about family and what it means to be apart of one. It also doesn’t seem to be shy away from what it was like during the days of the “Ice Age”. During that time, man and animal was locked in a desperate struggle to survive. This struggle affects all the characters on many levels. That aspect is probably what gives the film its PG-rating. The first half shows why it would be so unlikely that these heroes would team-up. It also sets the stage for the journey.

The only thing that bugged me about “Ice Age” was the animation. Audiences are used to the flawless execution of such films as “Monsters Inc” and “Shrek”. The style depicted in “Ice Age” is a lot different and the characters are animated with a lot of hard edges. They are still adorable and cuddly but don’t amplify the same realism as the other films. Maybe I am just spoiled but it did catch me off guard.

“Ice Age” is a lot of fun for families and the slapstick humor of poor Scrat is side-splittingly hilarious. The message of “Ice Age” is pure and should delight both children and adults.

(4 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer

Movie Review: Let Me In

Director Matt Reeves broke onto the scene when he wrote and directed the very limp David Schwimmer/Gwyneth Paltrow romantic-drama The Pallbearer in 1996.

Reeves moved on to co-creating Felicity with JJ Abrams where he directed five episodes including the pilot. He also wrote 73 episodes.

When JJ jumped to the big screen, he didn’t forget his partner. In 2008, Reeves directed the alien-invasion smash Cloverfield which JJ produced.

That brings us to LET ME IN. The movie is a remake of the 2008 Norweigan horror film, Let The Right One In. But it is one of those rare remakes that is in some ways equal to and superior than the original.

The movie stars Kodi Smit-McPhee, who we last saw as Viggo Mortensen’s traumatized son in The Road. In Let Me In, Kodi plays Owen, a bullied 12-year-old who has no friends and dreams of trying to stand up for himself. One night he watches a young girl, Abby (Chloe Moretz) and her father move in to the apartment next to his. He noticed that even though it is frigidly cold outside the girl is barefoot and has no problems walking in the snow.

The next evening Owen meets Abby on the playground in front of his apartment complex. She warns him they can never be friends and Owen wonders why. They become more and more curious about each other until one day Owen wants to become “blood brothers” with his friend. Abby freaks out and reveals she is in fact a vampire. Will their friendship survive the ultimate test? Is Owen’s life in danger from his new friend?

Director Matt Reeves is an interesting director to watch. You have his plain jane approach with The Pallbearer, sentimentality in the Felicity pilot, raw hand-held terror of Cloverfield and then the toned-down spooky approach seen in Let Me In. I think what makes Reeves so strong is he is the king of atmosphere and how he is able to adapt. Each one of his directorial efforts plays with atmosphere to amazing results.

Reeves directs the movie through a very claustrophobic lens. Many of his shots are over the shoulder, through a telescope, up-close and personal, etc. They are timed perfectly and where most American directors would go for the shock or flash everything is beautifully subdued. This is a directing feast!

I think for me what made this movie in some ways superior to the original is just how incredible the kids performances are in the film. Yes, the kids in the original were brilliant as well but these kids complimented the tone, atmosphere and story of the film.

Kodi Smit-McPhee was unforgettable as Viggo Mortensen’s sheltered yet broken son in The Road but here he takes his acting to the next level. From the scenes of where he is being bullied to the tender scenes with Abby this young actor is showing more depth than some actors twice his age.

Chloe Moretz, who was Hit Girl in Kick Ass proves once more that she is definitely the next Dakota Fanning. She is absolutely brilliant. She has innocence, danger and creepiness in every look and scene she’s in. It is just so haunting!

What a pleasant surprise and a remarkable film!

(4 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer

Retro Review: Ocean’s 12

The assembly of such an impressive cast that Ocean’s Eleven had seemed to be only an act that a director like Robert Altman (The Player and Short Cuts) could accomplish. But do it twice, that’s unheard of. Well not for director Steven Soderbergh, who brings back everyone from his smash hit Ocean’s Eleven and even adds a few.

The crew reassembles after they are tracked down by casino boss and madman Terry Benedict (Andy Garcia). Benedict threatens to kill all of them if they don’t pay back the $190 million dollars they stole from him in Ocean’s Eleven, and the catch is that they have to do it in two weeks.

Danny Ocean (George Clooney), Rusty (Brad Pitt), Linus (Matt Damon), and the rest of the crew flee to Europe to try to pay back Benedict. But before the money can be assembled, Ocean’s crew must out-smart a slick European thief known as the Night Fox (Vincent Cassel) and match wits with the persistent Europol agent Isabel Lahiri (Catherine Zeta-Jones). Can Ocean seal the deal in time and outwit, outlast, and outplay some of the best in the business?

Ocean’s Twelve was written by George Nolfi, who also wrote the sci-fi disaster Timeline, but it seems that Nolfi has come a long way from that project. His script for this sequel is witty, crafty, and adds more interesting details to a lot of the key players.

I really enjoyed how he handled a lot of the major characters, but felt he really didn’t know what to deal with some of the minor and older characters played by Don Cheadle, Elliot Gould, and Carl Reiner. For me, Reiner was one of my favorite characters from the original after Cheadle’s Basher, of course.

Another thing that really didn’t impress me was the lack of allure and goofiness that accompanied the first film. It was the comedy as well as the cleverness that sold so many on the first one.

I also felt that the original was more claustrophobic and more intimate than this film. There are so many ensemble pratfalls that this film runs into that you wonder why they actually needed to bring back every single one of the eleven stars from the first film. Sometimes less is more.

The final minutes of the film also lacked the awe and spectacle of the first film. I was hoping to be fooled, or at least to be kept guessing.

There are a lot of clever moments in this film and some of the dialogue is quite hilarious. The film just doesn’t play with every cast member properly and doesn’t hold onto the magic of the first one.

(3 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Ocean’s 11

Written: December 10, 2001

Slick, stylish and star heavy are some of the words that will spring forth from the mouths of movie-goers when they venture to see “Ocean’s Eleven”, the latest film from Academy Award winning director Steven Soderbergh.

Way back in 1960, “Ocean’s Eleven” became a staple film of the infamous “Rat Pack” which was headed by old blue eyes himself, Frank Sinatra. The 1960′s version was darker, seedier and oozed with the charisma of Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr., and Peter Lawford.

The plot of the 1960′s version involved a group of war buddies getting together to rob five Las Vegas casinos in a single night. What was the most memorable about the film besides the star-power was the film’s twist ending. It was a landmark film for the careers of Sinatra and Martin but what kind of panache and attraction did it have to be remade some 31 years later.

Director Steven Soderbergh’s version of the popular 1960′s film is a lot flashier, decadent and arrogant than his predecessor but the update and transformation envelopes and reflects more of what movies of today are really like. Soderbergh scales back the actual heist to three casinos instead of five and introduces a new dimension for the central character, Danny Ocean (now played by George Clooney).

Soderbergh then cleverly casts other big name stars in key positions to create his own “Rat Pack” if you will. Maybe we can call them the “Soder Pack”. Among the “Soder Pack” are Julia Roberts, Brad Pitt, Don Cheadle, Elliot Gould, Carl Reiner, Casey Affleck and Scott Caan. Three of the four top roles belong to the Soderbergh film alumni, which include Clooney, Roberts and Cheadle.

Soderbergh’s telling of this heist tale is brilliantly executed as he unravels the hidden gem within each cast member. He never gives away too much of how the heist will be executed which is key in developing a heist film. Then before we know it we are into the actual heist itself. I liked the interlaced humor, tongue-in-cheek arrogance and Soderbergh’s choice of a musical score. If the actor’s portrayals didn’t pay homage to the 1960′s version the musical score sure does.

The small problems I had with the 2001 Ocean’s Eleven lie in the film’s ending and the long musical montage that commences prior to the film’s epilogue. The original film had more surprises in the finale then I felt the update did. Once the ending starts to unravel you can predict how it will come out from pretty early on. I was waiting for another twist to make the film more memorable.

I do have to say that this film is the most stylish film of the year and as it always is with Soderbergh films, brilliantly executed.

Also as it always is with ensemble casts it is hard to judge who was the most suave and who had the stand out performance. My favorite in the film was Brad Pitt, if I did have to choose.

“Ocean’s Eleven” is a great little escape film for the holidays and it’s a film for everyone.

(4 of 5) So Says the Soothsayer.

Side Note: Mark Wahlberg was supposed to play the Matt Damon or Brad Pitt character. If you know could you email me? Wahlberg couldn’t make the shoot due to delays on “Planet of the Apes”. Wahlberg’s participation in this project would have been his third collaboration with Clooney.

Retro Review: Music & Lyrics

Ah, yes!

The stylish beats, big hair, tight jeans and polyester jackets of the 1980s. We all remember them well. Well, those who aren’t embarrassed and admit that they once danced to Rick Astley and hummed along with Wham!

I remember the 1980s really well and yes to this day I still love listening to 80s flashback songs and my Pet Shop Boys anthology is still a favorite. Anyways enough about me, we are here to talk about the new movie “Music & Lyrics” starring Hugh Grant and Drew Barrymore.

The film takes place in modern day as forgotten 80s pop star Alex Fletcher (Hugh Grant) had been literally forgotten. But recently his work with the 80s supergroup Pop! has seen a resurgence and he is doing a lot of remembering the 80s styled events. But when he is offered a version “Celebrity Boxing” as his next career move he starts wonder about his future. His manager (Brad Garrett) offers him a chance at a comeback when superstar and current pop icon Cora (Haley Bennett) requests that Fletcher write her a new song.

Fletcher begins work but he really doesn’t get any inspiration until he hears his new scatter-brained plant lady Sophie (Drew Barrymore) add a few lyrics to a rough cut of his new melody. Fletcher has found his muse and his new lyricist. Can they produce a decent tune in time? Can Fletcher overcome his insecurities and find a new path in life?

What makes for a good romantic comedy? Well for me that is a very difficult question to answer. I am not overly fond of the genre only because it has been done to death. If I have to say what makes for a good one it is probably two things. One chemistry between the stars and secondly there has to be a story more than just boy meets girl, they fight, boy loses girl and then boy makes giant romantic gesture to win girl back.

“Music & Lyrics” forgets the formula for two thirds of the film and it is quite pleasant. Grant and Barrymore have great chemistry and the film is more about the project. I was actually quite involved with the film during that portion. Then I started to notice the clichés crawling back onto the screen. I wanted to hit those cliches with a giant Nerf bat so that they wouldn’t harm such a cute little story but my valiant effort wasn’t strong enough. Sugar-coated clichés ran rampant and I became queasy.

I really like Grant and Barrymore and it was really enjoyable seeing them swell in their own moments. I also liked that they sang themselves instead of lip-synching. That’s what I gather but I can’t really say for sure. Grant really does have a good voice.
“Music & Lyrics” was a pleasant surprise except for the film’s third act.

(3.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Dawn of the Dead

There are staples of a genre and then there are the immortals. George A. Romero’s 1968 classic “Night of the Living Dead” is still one of the greatest horror films of all time. It still holds its own and scares the pants off you with each viewing. It is eternal.

Ten years after that classic, Romero awakened our fears once more with “Dawn of the Dead”. To some people this film is the pinnacle of zombie films and something not to be messed with. That is where my fears came from when I heard they were remaking it. Romero later completed his zombie trilogy with 1985’s “Day of the Dead”.

Those three films were some of the best horror films made in each of those decades. Less than a month after the release of “Day” the zombie genre took a horrible turn.

In August of 1985, a new kind of zombie movie was born. The film was “Return of the Living Dead” which took a lot of what Romero cherished and turned it on its ear by adding a goofy soundtrack, sub-standard heroes and comedic elements. The film was a hit and spawned 2 sequels. The comedy and gore delighted audiences but nearly killed the pure horror of the zombie.

In 1990, Hollywood revisited Romero’s 1968 classic with an incredibly interesting and fear ridden remake. It was an amazing attempt at trying to recapture the fear that Romero thrived in. The film thrived from incredible performances by unknown actors like Tony Todd (who would later become “Candy Man”) and Patricia Tallman (who would later become a regular on “Babylon 5”). It wasn’t as insanely clever, horrific or bold as the original but it was an amazing achievement and seemed to honor more than dismay the Romero classic.

That brings us to 2004 and Hollywood ventures back into Romero territory as it remakes the second in the classic trilogy.

Medical nurse Ana Clark (Sarah Polley) awakens one morning to see her world turned upside down. She is forced to flee her home when her husband Luis (Justin Louis) becomes infected with an unknown contagion which he seems to have contracted from a neighbor’s young girl.

Ana is wrought with horror, shock and bewilderment as she drives away from her home. Eventually Ana reunites with survivors Kenneth (Ving Rhames), Michael (Jake Weber), Andre (Mekhi Phifer) and his pregnant wife who are also enduring the ordeal of the outbreak.

The ragtag fugitives take refuge in a fortress of glass or to others a huge suburban mall. There they learn about what has happened, who each of them are and eventually plot an escape from the mob of growing zombies.

The 2004 version of “Dawn of the Dead” opens strongly and we are quickly captivated by the wrought but strong performance of Sarah Polley. Sadly her character seems to be the only one we really get to know.

Polley’s supporting characters excluding Ving Rhames and Jake Weber range from “cannon-fodder” to “red-neck” to annoying. I just wanted them all to be gobbled up by the mob. If these are the last of humanity please let us be wiped out.

That is kind of sad to say when capable actors like Mekhi Phifer, Matt Frewer, Lindy Booth and Jayne Eastwood are among them. Phifer has his moments but he seems terminal from his introduction and Frewer doesn’t stick around long enough.

If I were to classify this version of a Romero classic I would have to say that it in-between “Return of the Living Dead” and the 1990 remake. It isn’t by far in the same territory as anything done by Romero but as apocalypse/zombie films it would be a fun matinee movie. Last year’s “28 Days Later” was a far superior horror film than this.

Here’s the Great Zombie Breakdown:

Night of the Living Dead 1968 (5 out of 5)
Dawn of the Dead 1978 (4.5 out of 5)
Day of the Dead 1985 (4 out of 5)
Return of the Living Dead 1985 (3 out of 5)
Return of the Living Dead Part 2 1988 (2 out of 5)
Return of the Living Dead Part 3 (1.5 out of 5)
Night of the Living Dead 1990 (4 out of 5)
Dawn of the Dead 2004 (3.5 out of 5)

What’s your favorite zombie movie?

So Says the Soothsayer.

Retro Review: Secondhand Lions

The tradition of a solid family film filled with intrigue, delightful characters and a sense of adventure seems to be lost in the quagmire of the ever-evolving multiplex.

That tradition saw a re-ignition when Disney released HOLES last spring and FREAKY FRIDAY last month. It seems the family film is back in a big way if the trend holds.

Before the release of HOLES, studios seemed bent on releasing “brain-dead” comedies and pushing the envelope with computer animation to secure a successful film for the whole brood. Hopefully this is a new era dawning in family entertainment.

With the release of New Line Cinema’s “Secondhand Lions”, a new non-Disney family film revolution could spring forth.

Haley Joel Osment of “Sixth Sense” fame stars as Walter, a neglected and disenfranchised 12-year old boy who is severely lacking a strong male role-model in his life. His delusional mother, Mae (Kyra Sedgwick), learns that her eccentric uncles, Garth (Michael Caine) and Hub (Robert Duvall), have been squirreling away millions of dollars. The uncles have just resurfaced after a 40 year absence and Mae is convinced that if she abandons Walter with them that he will be able to find the riches. Where didn’t the legendary stash come from? Where have Walter’s great uncles been for the last 40 years?

The mysteries and tall-tales are a lot of the fun elements that dwell in this fun and original family film. “Lions” delivers a sense of awe and special bonding a wide-eyed boy might have when searching for a role-model. Writer-director Tim McCanlies finds that whole element of growing up and allows it to flourish within Osment’s character. It’s very magical but how could one not expect magic from the same writer-director who sculpted the nearly flawless animated film, “The Iron Giant”.

There are however flaws in “Lions” and its all-star cast. Osment has grown so much since “Sixth Sense” and looks a lot older than the 12-year old he is playing. Osment, 15, has shot up at least a foot and filled out considerably since his last film.

It is hard finding what McCanlies is trying to see in Osment when he looks like he should already know who Santa really is. The disbelief and wonderment are the cornerstones of the film and it’s hard to imagine them in a vastly maturing Osment.

The second flaw is the overtly rugged portrayal by Robert Duvall who becomes the hero in so many of the film’s legendary flashbacks. Duvall only shows a breakdown and some compassion towards the end of the film which seems very flat. Compared to Duvall, Caine’s uncle is a lot more fun as his character’s depth tries to help flesh out the two-dimensional Duvall. Just wish we got more personable with Duvall’s hero character.

I really loved the casting of Emmanuelle Vaugier (TV’s Smallville) Christian Kane (TV’s “Angel”) in the flashback sequences. Their whole story and acting reminded me so much of those old Arabian Nights movies I remember when I was a kid.

There is a lot of cherish in “Lions” and it is a delightful film for the whole family despite some obvious flaws.

(4 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.