Foreign Friday: Butterfly

A European import teaches us how simple and beautiful film can be.

“La lengua de las mariposas” or “Butterfly Tongues” (in some US markets) tells the delightful story of Moncho, a young boy’s coming of age as his world opens up through the eyes of his beloved teacher, Don Gregorio.

As the teacher brings the boy into the fascinating world of butterflies, the boy begins to emerge from his cocoon. But looming on the horizon is the surgence of a fascist regime that threatens to unravel their innocent world.

In the summer of 1936, which is when the films takes place, the whole of Spain was intertwined in the struggle between the Mussolini inspired Nationalist Party and the Republicans.

But as the rest of Europe was being over run by a couple different fascist regimes, Spain was trying desperately to prevent that outcome.

The film “Butterfly” brings in these elements and lets these two main characters deal with the impending doom and the heart-breaking aftermath.

The film also beautifully depicts these simple folks who are desperately trying to find their way in the world. From one side you have the teacher who is just trying to bring peace to his students and their world. And on the other a young boy trying to understand the gigantic world around him.

The teachings of the butterflies are a metaphor for the change coming in Spain and in both of their lives.

This metaphor rings cleverly through each character in the film which does beg the question did the teacher know about the coming conflict and was trying to say something subtly.

After watching this film, I learned the character of Don Gregorio was played by a legendary Spanish actor named Fernando Fernan Gomez. I could see even before I knew who he was that this man is amazing. I haven’t seen this kind of subtle grace since Sir John Gielgud. I wish I had a teacher like him in my life.

(4 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Friday: Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest

It has all come to this!

The Millennium trilogy has done a good job of slowly giving us the twisted pieces of heroine Lisbeth Salander’s past.

The first film followed Lisbeth as she met and befriended disgraced journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyquvist) and stopped a serial killer.

The second film peeled back layers of Lisbeth as we meet her demented father and albino Frankenstein brother.

In the conclusion to the trilogy, Lisbeth is put on trial for three murders after she recovers from a nearly fatal gunshot wound to the head. Can Lisbeth solve the demons the have been plaguing her? Can she finally let a man into her life that she can trust? And what exactly happened to the albino at the end of the last film?

All these questions are answered as the trilogy concludes.

The film like the others takes a really long time to get going. But it is an hour in and you are saying will this film ever pick up? It really doesn’t, it meanders a lot!

There is a subplot about a threat made on the employees of Blomkvist’s magazine and I guess they thought this was interesting enough since Lisbeth is bed-ridden for nearly 2/3 of the movie. I think this is exactly why this conclusion feels a little forced.

The series has never been about neat little bows, cleaning up loose ends and well having people live happily ever after. Remember this is Scandinavia. Thank goodness the ending at least lives up to the series.

But what seems to bug me is just how uninteresting more than half of this film is.

The cinematography is paint-by-numbers. The staging of scenes is very loose. And well the structure is way off.

The only saving grace are the stalwart performances from the film’s leads. Rapace has been honing this character since day one and you can tell she never wants to let it go.

Nyquvist is also quite strong but you have to remember he is the straight man to this duo and following his life for over 90 minutes is well, extremely dull. Blomkvist is not the reason we have been pushing through these films.

The film’s last hour does wrap some bows on some things but leaves you scratching your head on others. Which for this viewer is just perfect.

I am not sure how close of an adaptation this is to the novel but I am sure Blomkvist’s private life was more interesting in the novel.

At least there you would know what is actually going on inside his mind. Especially during the scene where Blomkvist’s girlfriend says that you are either an “ego-maniac” or “insane”.

It is hard to rate this film because the last hour is very much in vain of the series but the first 1.5 hours is such a bore to get through.

I enjoyed the trilogy and my favorite of the three I would have to say was the second one. The mystery aspects of the first one are some of best scenes in the series. But its the pacing, revelations and insane performance from Rapace that makes the second film the gem of the trilogy and no wonder she is a hot commodity in Hollywood.

I will be very curious to see the remake in the coming weeks. You will see my review of the remake on this blog before Christmas.

2.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Friday: Girl Who Played with Fire

We are taken back into the dark world of Stockholm’s underworld again through the lens of author Stieg Larsson.

This time our heroine Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace) is up to her neck in trouble when she is framed for three murders including two of Mikael Blomkvist’s (Michael Nyquvist) friends. Lisbeth’s framing could be linked to Blomkvist’s latest expose on a sex trafficking ring  involving some of Stockholm’s richest clients.

The twists and turns of Dragon Tattoo are directly related to uncovering who is the murderer and the characters themselves are just along for the ride like the audience.

The sequel does a good job of keeping the twists and turns coming but this time it is playing closer to the vest. The movie relishes in pealing back the layers of one, Lisbeth Salander. In the first film, we catch a glimpse of Lisbeth’s past. We are told about a grisly fire that Lisbeth set when she was younger. Now, we learn who the victim was.

So who is this twisted, mixed-up and highly guarded woman? Why does Blomkvist care so much for her?

All will be revealed and this story is almost more shocking that the previous film’s complete plot.

Like the previous entry and seems to be a commonality in the series, the prologue to the movie’s actual plot is long and drawn out. If you can survive the first 35 minutes or so the pacing picks up and we are thrown head long into the film’s plot.

I liked how the author brought these two people back together as the mystery crisscrosses their lives. I found this more interesting then how they originally were pulled together.

Rapace is wonderful again as Lisbeth. She is the action hero in these stories while Blomkvist is the thinker. Nyquvist seems to be more comfortable in his role in this film than in the previous entry.

If you love these characters then you are going to love the sequel. I have to say that the sequel outweighs the original in some ways but falls back in others. But overall I would say it is equal to the first film.

3.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer

Retro Review: Amelie

The new French film “Amelie” tells the story of what happens when two unsuspecting introverts find love. Newcomer Audrey Tautou plays Amelie, a reluctant and reclusive girl who has a peculiar way of interacting with the people in her little part of Paris.

Amelie is looking for love and a way to understand the world around her. Her misadventures and interactions with an introverted photo-collector delve into blissful hilarity.

“Amelie” is one of those little comedies that comes along and changes your whole idea on what comedies mean to us as a society. This little French film is just that. It’s flawless in its execution as we really get close to Amelie and her deeply set and introverted world.

Tautou is a cinematic treasure that can only be compared to the likes of silent screen actresses of the 1920’s. She can say so much in a tilt of the head and a blink of the eye. It is utterly amazing how films can discover amazing unknowns.

I loved the film for its honesty, humor and how a lot of us are afraid to take chances in our lives. This is so very felt in all the characters in this film. When you see a film of this caliber you wonder why can’t North Americans make comedies like this anymore. North American comedies seem to be focused on toilet humor and gross out gags as we continue to be hung up on our social taboos. Don’t get me wrong there are funny North American comedies just none that I can recall that are as genuine as this one.

There is some brilliant writing and direction in this film as the writer-director enlightens us with so many original and captivating characters like the “brittle-boned” painter and maybe even the pig that turns out Amelie’s light. Director Jean-Pierre Jeunet, who wrote and directed the film, really has struck gold with Amelie.

Jeunet is usually connected more with the macabre and blackest of French comedies including “Delicatessen” and “City of Lost Children”. Jeunet’s last film was “Alien: Resurrection” of all things.

When the Oscars come calling I hope “Amelie” should be crossover foreign film like “Crouching Tiger”, “Il Postino” and “Life is Beautiful”. It should be nominated for at least best actress (Tautou), best picture and best director.

(4.5 out of 5)

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Review: Howl’s Moving Castle

Master storyteller Hayao Miyazaki follows-up his Academy Award winning animated film “Spirited Away” with a tale of wizards, witches, spells and mysterious walking castle.

The story concerns a timid hat-decorator Sofi (Emily Mortimer) who falls under an aging spell by the Witch of the Waste (Lauren Bacall). Sofi is forced to seek out an eccentric wizard named Howl (Christian Bale) whose magical wandering castle travels around the country. She can’t talk about her curse or who cursed her. Sofi becomes Howl’s new housecleaner in hopes of one day finding her freedom.

The intricate worlds, animals, machines, supporting players and magic that Miyazaki dreams up is always out of this world and a sight to behold. There are so many storylines in this film that you just never know where the film will go next.

My favorite characters in the whole film were the silent bouncing scarecrow Turnip-Head and of course Billy Crystal’s delightful fiery character Calcifer. Crystal is out of this world as this character and has so many clever moments.

I have to admit I did have some problems with some of the story and the film’s eventual conclusion. I never felt that Sofi’s age-transition was properly discussed or examined especially in the last half of the film. I also felt that her story arc suffered greatly from the over-whelming Howl storyline. The film’s conclusion feels way to Disney and didn’t wrap up some of the other characters storylines.

Miyazaki’s new epic fantasy is amazing, breathtaking and a sight to behold. Miyazaki has always had a gift for finding the most interesting and fantastical stories. This film will fit nicely into his body of work.

3.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Review: District B13

Action filmmaker and producer Luc Besson has always had an eye for action and having the ability to showcase it in a strange and unusual way. He honed the skills of Jet Li and Jason Statham with glorious success. He even turned his ex-lover Milla Jovovich into a female wrecking machine.

Now Besson hopes to find the next great action star in French sensation David Belle who founded a new form of martial arts called parkour. This new form is basically where the artist attempts to pass obstacles in the fastest and most direct manner possible by running, jumping, climbing, sliding, ducking and so forth.

Co-writer Luc Besson and director Pierre Morel sculpt out a story where an undercover cop (Cyril Raffaelli) must infiltrate one of the nastiest neighborhoods in 2010 Paris. The neighborhood is District 13.

The cop is joined by a convict (David Belle) who will guide him in his pursuit to find a neutron bomb somewhere in the district. But the convict also has an agenda all his own. Don’t they always.

The film’s plot, setup, direction and cinematography leave a lot to be desired. But if they were all state of the art and amazing then I guess we wouldn’t really be able to see what Belle can do with his “parkour”.

The sequences where parkour is focused are amazing and the stunt work flawless. It kind of reminded me a lot of the better Jackie Chan movies. You know where you stop and say to yourself, how do they do that?

The acting in the film reminded me of old “Godzilla” movies or Power Rangers episodes because even though I saw the film with subtitles and in its original French it still looked like it was dubbed and the audio was horrendous.

A-class stunts + lame ass plot = rental. Or at least it does in my books.

1 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Fridays: Brotherhood of the Wolf

Deep within the lush forests and hills of French Gevaudan in the late seventeen hundreds, a beast preyed upon unwilling citizens. The creature’s jaws were described as so large that they could squash a man’s head with one snap.

Unbeknownst to the many of the citizens of the Gevaudan, the beast was also protecting a dark secret.

The French film “Brotherhood of the Wolf” delivers the audience deep within this myth and uses its basis for inspiration. Grégoire de Fronsac (Samuel Le Bihan) is accompanied by his Iroquois Indian blood brother, Mani (Martial arts sensation Mark Dacascos) as they journey into Gevaudan. Fronsac and Mani try to uncover the origin and mystery surrounding the beast.

But it seems the closer they get the more political problems stand in their way. Fronsac falls in love with a beautiful and courageous young woman named Marianne (Emilie Dequenne) who is the daughter one of the prominent citizens of Gevaudan. What is the mystery plaguing the citizens of Gevaudan?

Director Christophe Gans’s “Brotherhood of the Wolf” is a rich and intensely mesmerizing piece of filmmaking. Its lush settings, in all degrees of weather, give the film scope and texture. There are scenes in heavily forested areas, cluttered demonic caves, a penetrating blizzard, and a torrential rainstorm. It’s amazing to see a director using so many different kinds of atmospheres in one film.

This film reminded me a lot of the Beowulf legend of ancient times where Fronsac would be Beowulf and the beast is Grendel. Fronsac’s hunting of the creature and how close he becomes connected the people around him is very Beowulf.

Some scenes reminded me of “Last of the Mohicans” where others reminded me of “The Thirteenth Warrior”. I loved the no holds barred action sequences and the fluid motion of Dacascos’s martial arts.

My favorite character was Mani because while watching this film I did feel like an outsider much the way he must have felt. In reading subtitles and embracing a film in a different language, an audience member can often feel like an outsider.

With “Brotherhood” you have a connection to Mani which eases you into the film. I can’t wait to relive this film’s scope and experience on DVD with an English track. So I can pick up some of the key plot points I probably missed while following the subtitles.

My only real problem with “Brotherhood” was the film’s third act. I had a hard time following the plot as there are a lot twists and turns as the secret is unveiled. I had some problems with how the secret itself was unveiled.

There probably was a more straightforward approach to its revelation than how the director chose. I wish Fronsac would have uncovered the secret more as a detective that through manipulation of the film’s script and focus.

Besides that flaw, “Brotherhood” is a cinematic experience that is like no other. That itself could be an understatement.

4 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Review: Attila (1954)

Attila could be the worst movie that the late Anthony Quinn ever starred in.

Quinn stars as the world’s second most famous barbarian who also tried to takedown the Roman Empire. The story focuses on Attila sitting outside the border of Italy waiting to pounce but his diplomatic brother, Bleda, would rather negotiate a treaty than kill Romans. Atilla will have none of that so he has his brother killed.

Meanwhile idiotic and cowardly Roman emperor, Valentinian III, panics about what to do about the barbarian. His smarter more cunning sister Honoria (Sophia Loren) offers herself up as a bride to Attila if he will spare her brother and Rome.

The movie has one of the worst scripts I have ever seen with this kind of rich tapestry for a story.

Attila was wild, crazy, debonaire, relentless and brave. Quinn gives the barbarian a bravado like John Wayne gave many of his western heroes but without the scruples. The performance is credible to all the over-acting and silliness from his supporting players. Some of the performances reminded me of “mimes on speed.” Except these mimes shovel the garbage that is this script.
When the film switches from the regal halls of Rome to Attila’s HQ, it almost feels like you accidentally sat on a remote and changed channels. At Attila’s HQ, the setting and silly dialogue make it feel like it was ripped right out of a 70s kung-fu movie.

Then in Rome, a 70s porno without, well, the porn. It is an interesting contrast but felt wrong.

The wardrobe on this film tried to be epic but I found the spandex very distracting, especially the spandex behind Attila’s huge codpiece. Then there was the makeup. How come the Huns look like Mongols? Did Huns look like Mongols? It’s just bizarre.

The seduction scene where Loren goes to Quinn is the best scene of the film. Loren is looking her best and the seduction is very Samson and Delilah-esque. Loren looks ravishing in a revealing white gown as Quinn’s barbarian is caught off guard and speechless. Loren’s gown in that scene is the best of the film, hands down.

The scene ends with the hysterical line, “How I have longed for your lips!” Why this is so funny is that he just slobber kissed her with his mouth still half full of food. His cheeks look like a gopher. It’s these kinds of silly things that make this film rich for parody. Or think about it, is this already a parody?

The film never really reaches the tone it needs to be. They wanted it to be epic, historic, sexy and starring two giant stars. What they got was an 80-minute movie, with super silly dialogue and over-blown performances.

If you want to laugh at the film, I give it four stars. But the film wants to be taken seriously.

1.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer

Side note: You can find this film on the Sophia Loren DVD collection from Lionsgate. The best film of collection is Sunflower, watch for that review on future edition of Foreign Fridays.

Foreign Review: Detective

At first glance Jean-Luc Goddard’s 1985 drama Detective looks and feels like a Robert Altman film. You have pretty much four intertwining stories that feed off each other as they move along. Altman was famous for the multi-story narrative that would eventually have the stories collide into one theme. Many directors have been influenced by Altman and his focus on character.

Jean-Luc Goddard was one of the founding members of French New Wave cinema. Which showcased a departure from standard cinema and explored a deeper and often darker approach to conventional storytelling. Goddard’s two most famous films “Breathless” and “Alphaville” were famous because of how they pushed that boundary even though they were two decades a part. If you haven’t seen either, seek them out especially Breathless.

In Detective, Goddard mixes up the crime drama into a multi-story narrative like Altman. The whole movie takes place in a hotel. You have one story that involves two detectives investigating a murder. One that involves a couple going through the ups and downs of marriage. You have a young boxer preparing and dealing with the aftermath of a fight. And finally it is revealed that the couple is blackmailing the boxer’s promoter.

French New Wave auteur Jean-Luc Goddard

French New Wave auteur Jean-Luc Goddard

What is really off-the-wall about the film is that it certain places the story will stop and the movie will start quoting random things. Like you have Shakespeare’s The Tempest, John Milton’s Paradise Lost, etc. On top of the crazy “quote” pauses, you have some rather disturbing images and frank nudity.
One scene that made me scratch my head was when the couple is delivered a tea cart for breakfast. There is a wet dead mouse on the cart and when the man pours his coffee it is blood. What was the significance of that scene? What effect was it trying to convey? Does “new friend” echo the blackmail scheme? I still don’t get it. But it was a rather intense image.

My favorite scenes were always the quieter scenes between the boxer and his lover (Stephane Ferrera and Emmanuelle Seigner) and the tenderness they shared. It is not what you would expect. Detective was Seigner’s second film. Three years after the film, she became famous for becoming director Roman Polanski’s most significant muse and wife. She then starred alongside Harrison Ford in Frantic.

I also adored the performances from Nathalie Baye and Claude Brasseur who play the couple. They seemed to be the most genuine and examined characters in the film.

Side note, this is the fourth film of Julie Delpy, who was 14 when she made the movie.

I can’t say I thoroughly enjoyed Detective but really anything that pushes the envelope in cinema is good to see at least one. Easily Breathless is still my favorite Goddard film. Look for more Goddard films as the blog continues.

3 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer.

Foreign Review: Le Samourai

Le Samourai is one of Quentin Tarantino’s favorite films. He says that the French classic influenced him on creating the world of Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.

The 1967 movie stars French superstar Alain Delon as Jef Costello, an assassin who lives a life of isolation and mistrust. When Jef is arrested for one of his assassinations, he relies on his girlfriend (Nathalie Delon) to get him off. But can she be trusted? Does she know that Jef actually did the murder?

The rest of the film comprises of two complicated cat-and-mouse games with Costello trying to outwit masterful police superintendent (Francois Perier) and also trying to get paid for the assassination.

What makes Le Samourai such an interesting watch is its use of color, subtlety and the amazing performance from Alain Delon. I loved how his whole apartment was painted with various shades of grey seeming to accent his unsettling life. And how Delon makes just a simple movement like putting on a hat and a trenchcoat and event.

The tapestry that is in this film is mesmerizing. The cinematography and the attention to detail.

There is a scene in the police precinct when Costello is being interrogated by the police inspector and it is probably the subtlest  interrogation scene I have ever see. But it could also be the most effective I have ever seen. The scene involves Delon being placed in a lineup where he is questioned by the inspector while five witnesses examine him. Then when the inspector doesn’t get what hewants he has Delon stand in a room full of identically dressed men. Meanwhile to usually cold and unaffected Delon must try to keep himself restrained. The audience is nervous, Delon is nervous and the inspector is frustrated. It is quite a effective scene and a really interesting way of mixing it up for the audience.

Nathalie Delon

Nathalie Delon

I liked Le Samourai but I found that the film didn’t allow the main character to connect with the audience the way we needed. Yes he is a loner and assassin but there needed to be a connection so that we care for him and want for him to succeed. This connection was supposed to be by Alain Delon’s beautiful real-life wife Nathalie but I just never felt she was that key. I think if there was something raw there, passionate and revealing, we would have connected more. But that is French melo-drama!

3.5 out of 5

So Says the Soothsayer